|
From: <ma...@la...> - 2011-07-27 13:12:41
|
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:05:39 +0400, Alex Peshkoff <pes...@ma...> wrote: > On 07/27/11 16:56, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: >> On 27/07/2011 09:45, Alex Peshkoff wrote: >>> If we can provide such restrictions (probably the best will be to have >>> fixed list of acceptable "uses"), this can be enough. >>> >> And just an invalid pointer access will turn down your server who tried >> to be secure. > > Unfortunately yes. > BTW, how is it solved in Java? Java itself does not support pointer manipulation, and it applies bounds checking of arrays. Only potential for problems would be the interface native Firebird <> Java. Mark |