|
From: Alex P. <pes...@ma...> - 2010-11-23 11:55:49
|
On 11/23/10 13:37, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > 23.11.2010 11:34, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: >> 23.11.2010 13:22, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: >> >>>> What is promised is SMP-friendly shared cache. It doesn't have to be >>>> SuperServer. >>> Doesn't matter. For asynchronous SQL non-serialized DSQL is enough. >> Who said DSQL would be non-serialized? Shared page cache doesn't >> necessarily require low level synchronization in the every subsystem. > What's the point for it to be serialized? AFAIK, SQL parser doesn't use global resources. > It does use internal engine's calls to access data from database. |