|
From: Alexander P. <pes...@ma...> - 2010-01-08 13:24:48
|
On Friday 08 January 2010 16:15:20 Vlad Khorsun wrote: > > Also please pay attention - the fact that server does not reuse pages > > after 'DROP TABLE' does not explain performance degradation. If for any > > run each table containt X pages, why should we have visible performance > > difference when this pages are located in the beginning of the file or in > > the end of it. Specially well seen in series 11-20 from original Gary's > > letter. > > Seems like DROP and subsequent CREATE TABLE was failed. And > garbage collection is blocked during test run. But why did database become smaller after backup+restore in that case? Remember, no DELETE FROM, only DROP. |