|
From: Jason L. W. <jwh...@jw...> - 2007-07-25 17:55:46
|
Adriano wrote: > Jason L Wharton wrote: > > I much prefer the <column reference> because it allows > > the table alias to be taken into consideration which > > helps to distinguish which relation a column is a part of. > > This problem was dicussed in the tracker. > See CORE-1224. Yes, this is very much along the lines of what I need. Only difference is I am working from the client and this seemed to deal with BLR of EXECUTE BLOCK command. In theory, there is no difference. Relation alias support for columns on the FOR UPDATE OF <column list> as well as on UPDATE and DELETE statements will make it so that joined datasets can be worked with precisely. I don't know if I should work with the CORE-1224 or if I should make a new entry and then just reference CORE-1224. I hope to learn the bug tracking system better. Looks like something that would be very nice for IBO. How might I look into setting up something similar for IBO? Thanks, Jason L Wharton www.ibobjects.com |