Re: [Firebird-devel] Obsolete files in Vulcan.

[Roman R. <rro...@ac...>]

RR>> And what happens if SF.net crashes?
>
> Are you seriously suggesting to use commented source code as a backup
> mechanism? ;-)

As I understand, the original talk was about journal/, dudley/, wal/ and 
ipserver/ directories, not the commented parts of the source file. Sure, the 
code that is commented out as obsolete must be deleted (or if it is 
valuable, converted into a nice text file with header "if you want to do 
this, please use the following pattern" and moved to a doc/ directory).

As to Jim's idea of leaving code commented out in the files until the new 
code works and does not introduce new problems... I'm afraid that would 
start the next ideological war here, but the code that does not work should 
not be committed to the CVS. But really, let's not start the flame war 
here...

Roman