From: Alex P. <pe...@in...> - 2004-04-23 11:54:38
|
James K. Lowden wrote: >On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Alex Peshkov <pe...@in...> wrote: > > >>there do exist a lot of other popular data exchange >>standards. What about posix? If I'm not mistaken, ODBC is windows >>specific thing. >> >> > >No Posix standard, no XML standard, no any standard. ODBC, bad as it is, >is the nearest thing to a portable database library API. True, it came >from Windows, but it's been adopted by the Unix world. There's nothing in >the specification that requires Windows. > >I'm not sure what you mean by "data exchange" standard. > I meant ODBC, ADO, BDE,... This more or less standard ways to get data from different sources (various SQL servers, DBF-files, plain text files, etc.) and to represent to the application, using this data, in more or less initial format independent way. I don't know why should ODBC be preferred to other ones. It's widely used in Windows world, but you said - adopted to by the Unix world. For example, I don't know about firebird ODBC driver for linux. Alex. >There are some >ideas out floating around out there, but I've never seen anything nailed >down, certainly nothing I'd call popular. Happy to be enlighted, though. >:-) > >--jkl > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek >For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35 >or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th! >http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297 >Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel > > > > |