|
From: Dimitry S. <SD...@to...> - 2003-10-15 06:02:01
|
On 14 Oct 2003 at 7:13, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote: >Maybe the long term solution is to make all callers aware that they can't >request zero elements in the array, but they are logically correct: they >request some node types that don't have arguments, hence they send zero. >It's that #$%^&* design throughout the code that defines the first element >inside the parent node that hurts us. That's why I suggested to use zero-length arrays, but the suggestion was rejected as non-standard. SY, Dimitry Sibiryakov. |