|
From: Ann W. H. <aha...@ib...> - 2002-12-03 15:54:26
|
At 03:01 PM 12/3/2002 +0200, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote: >Mike Nordell wrote: > > > I believe a FIRST/SKIP on an unordered set would be completely useless. > If I > > have an unordered set S, and subtract a set "first" M from S, and S-M could > > return completely different responses from time to time given the same set > > S, would it be useful for anything but stochastic theory research? > >To my point of view it's wrong to forbid such constructions. If it doesn't >damage anything, why to forbid it? Maybe somebody can find it useful (for >example, some analogue of random rows). I use FIRST/SKIP to test formatting etc. while developing programs... I really don't care about the test data, just want to see a finite amount of it. Regards, Ann www.ibphoenix.com We have answers. |