RE: [Firebird-devel] FB and boolean data types

[Leyne, S. <sl...@at...>]

> In fact, not necessary. Boolean can be implemented in the=20
> current ODS as yet
> another numeric subtype (always mapped to dtype_short). I have a draft
> implementation of this, so if the time will allow... why not in v1.5?

Well I guess that depends on the goal of v1.5. =20

I had expected that v1.5 would be a 'staging' point, from the v1.0 code
base to the more substantial v2.0 (new features).  We have been
discussing v1.5 in those terms for quite some time.

As such, I had hoped that we could get through the v1.5 fairly quickly,
by minimizing the addition of new features.

As we start to add new features, I fear that the final v1.5 release will
be delayed.


Sean