RE: [Firebird-devel] Feedback requested (longish)

[Ann W. H. <aha...@ib...>]

At 06:20 PM 3/9/2002 -0500, Leyne, Sean wrote:
>Ann,
>
> > So what do we say to the people currently using classic because
> >
> > 1) It's much faster for local connections
>
>Wouldn't restoring (or is it implementing) XNET support go a long way to
>resolving this issue?

Yes, but you've still got two processes where classic has one. On
Unix et al. that's not a huge problem because processes are light-
weight.  Windows shows its VMS heritage with heavy-weight processes
and expensive context switches.

Regards,


Ann