You can subscribe to this list here.
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(55) |
Dec
(36) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 |
Jan
(38) |
Feb
(108) |
Mar
(79) |
Apr
(95) |
May
(64) |
Jun
(130) |
Jul
(146) |
Aug
(121) |
Sep
(96) |
Oct
(149) |
Nov
(161) |
Dec
(113) |
2004 |
Jan
(113) |
Feb
(163) |
Mar
(248) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(157) |
Jun
(160) |
Jul
(236) |
Aug
(284) |
Sep
(293) |
Oct
(277) |
Nov
(257) |
Dec
(356) |
2005 |
Jan
(203) |
Feb
(190) |
Mar
(220) |
Apr
(165) |
May
(124) |
Jun
(160) |
Jul
(190) |
Aug
(142) |
Sep
(152) |
Oct
(189) |
Nov
(187) |
Dec
(159) |
2006 |
Jan
(170) |
Feb
(151) |
Mar
(212) |
Apr
(262) |
May
(226) |
Jun
(196) |
Jul
(223) |
Aug
(165) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(348) |
Nov
(225) |
Dec
(141) |
2007 |
Jan
(261) |
Feb
(161) |
Mar
(222) |
Apr
(193) |
May
(121) |
Jun
(157) |
Jul
(151) |
Aug
(159) |
Sep
(61) |
Oct
(123) |
Nov
(172) |
Dec
(96) |
2008 |
Jan
(104) |
Feb
(138) |
Mar
(131) |
Apr
(131) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(107) |
Jul
(89) |
Aug
(89) |
Sep
(172) |
Oct
(158) |
Nov
(119) |
Dec
(86) |
2009 |
Jan
(52) |
Feb
(84) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(83) |
May
(54) |
Jun
(79) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(62) |
Sep
(50) |
Oct
(147) |
Nov
(50) |
Dec
(70) |
2010 |
Jan
(135) |
Feb
(113) |
Mar
(74) |
Apr
(93) |
May
(35) |
Jun
(71) |
Jul
(33) |
Aug
(110) |
Sep
(47) |
Oct
(18) |
Nov
(61) |
Dec
(34) |
2011 |
Jan
(46) |
Feb
(47) |
Mar
(25) |
Apr
(24) |
May
(21) |
Jun
(22) |
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(51) |
Sep
(31) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(22) |
Dec
(22) |
2012 |
Jan
(31) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(25) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(33) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(32) |
Oct
(25) |
Nov
(52) |
Dec
(35) |
2013 |
Jan
(43) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(36) |
Apr
(45) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(31) |
Aug
(24) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
(59) |
Nov
(47) |
Dec
(25) |
2014 |
Jan
(27) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(24) |
Aug
(28) |
Sep
(16) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(44) |
Dec
(40) |
2015 |
Jan
(52) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(18) |
Aug
(41) |
Sep
(71) |
Oct
(60) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(43) |
2016 |
Jan
(60) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
(21) |
Apr
(28) |
May
(23) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(37) |
Sep
(33) |
Oct
(15) |
Nov
(22) |
Dec
(20) |
2017 |
Jan
(27) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(48) |
Apr
(19) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(19) |
Aug
(36) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(5) |
2018 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(17) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
2019 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(1) |
2020 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(16) |
2021 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(8) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Jiri C. <di...@ci...> - 2013-11-12 15:07:35
|
Hi *, I found a bug in connection pool. I *don't* know the root cause. But anyway I think the code there isn't "good" or "nice", so to speak. But I currently have an application in front of me, that escalates the problem, some memory leaks. I think I might go to rewrite the pooling (I implemented one earlier this year for another provider) and test it. Hopefully it will be simpler, faster and correct. BUT it might (will) not have exactly same API/behavior as the old one (and I don't wanna to try mimic it). So it will be huge breaking change if you rely on something like that. Of course the major version number will be incremented. And I hope I'll not introduce more bugs. ;) Is there anybody against it? -- Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder) http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com |
From: Jiri C. <di...@ci...> - 2013-11-05 09:35:50
|
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 4:35 PM, André Knappstein <Kna...@be...> wrote: > I am definitely incapable of inventing sophisticated test suites by > myself, but I am always willing to help if I can. > > I have some spare machines running different Windows versions and > surely won't need them for several days. So if you have a good idea > how to create a useful "heavy load test", I could set up a small > system with a server and 2 or 3 clients running these tests for some > days. I don't have any good test application. But we can let unit tests run in multiple instances all over again. It will crash or not. Better than nothing. -- Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder) http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com |
From: André K. <Kna...@be...> - 2013-11-04 15:32:17
|
I am definitely incapable of inventing sophisticated test suites by myself, but I am always willing to help if I can. I have some spare machines running different Windows versions and surely won't need them for several days. So if you have a good idea how to create a useful "heavy load test", I could set up a small system with a server and 2 or 3 clients running these tests for some days. > Hi *, > is here anybody who I'd like to put FirebirdClient into (long) test > under (preferably) some load? > I started work on async support and with that I'll also have to redo > all the lock-ing there. Because these are either wrong or not > necessary (and often both). But there's also a lot of magic happening > thanks to old [1] code that's executed under GC. And that's hard to > test. > I'd like to redesign it completely (and not only this, have you seen > i.e. connection pooling...), but until somebody give a few months of > time, it's just wish. > [1] Let's face it, the code is crappy. Redesign would be nice. But I > don't blame anybody, 5-10 years ago it was different story. .NET was > different (a lot) and we had different understanding of how it works > and should work (and how we should design code). mit freundlichen Grüßen, André Knappstein EDV und Controlling ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ beta Eigenheim- und Grundstücksverwertungsgesellschaft mbH Hafenweg 4 59192 Bergkamen-Rünthe Telefon: +49 2389 9240 140 Telefax: +49 2389 9240 150 e-mail: kna...@be... Amtsgericht Hamm Nr. B 420 Geschäftsführer: Achim Krähling, Dirk Salewski und Matthias Steinhaus USt-IDNr.: DE 125215402 |
From: Sergio C. (JIRA) <tr...@fi...> - 2013-11-03 16:54:15
|
Calling Database.SqlQuery<T> results Invalid attempt of read when the reader is closed (EF6) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: DNET-527 URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/DNET-527 Project: .NET Data provider Issue Type: Bug Components: ADO.NET Provider Affects Versions: 3.2.0.0 Reporter: Sergio Cardenas Assignee: Jiri Cincura This line: MyContext.Database.SqlQuery<MyTableDO>("select * from my_table where id = 1").First(); throws an exception "Invalid attempt of read when the reader is closed". This is working in the provider for EF5 but not in version for EF6 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira |
From: Jiri C. <di...@ci...> - 2013-11-02 09:56:48
|
Oh, maybe good to know. In 99% there will be no data corruption or something like that. It'll just run fine or crash in huge fire. -- Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder) http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com |
From: Jiri C. <di...@ci...> - 2013-11-02 09:55:08
|
Hi *, is here anybody who I'd like to put FirebirdClient into (long) test under (preferably) some load? I started work on async support and with that I'll also have to redo all the lock-ing there. Because these are either wrong or not necessary (and often both). But there's also a lot of magic happening thanks to old [1] code that's executed under GC. And that's hard to test. I'd like to redesign it completely (and not only this, have you seen i.e. connection pooling...), but until somebody give a few months of time, it's just wish. [1] Let's face it, the code is crappy. Redesign would be nice. But I don't blame anybody, 5-10 years ago it was different story. .NET was different (a lot) and we had different understanding of how it works and should work (and how we should design code). -- Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder) http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com |
From: Rand R. <ran...@ou...> - 2013-10-30 15:37:35
|
So am I a lost case, or is there a possibility to fix it? From: ran...@ou... To: fir...@li... Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:39:37 +0000 Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] DbProviderServices Hi. Thanks for the post on your website, I am already able to run the EF6 solution I have, but I am unable to use the edmx file. Still getting the same errors. And your post only has the following entry You might want to use the Entity Framework's designer for instance and use DDEX in which case you need to install some other parts, but the core concept is the same. Once you understand these few steps (try changing or not doing something to see what goes wrong) you should have no problems doing it. afraid to say it, but I still have problems doing it. Since I am using Model-First I rely on the entity model to work 100%. Deleting the entry out of machine.config, and only relying to app.config results in edmx file not opening as a whole. (Application is running without problems) Message: The ADO.NET provider with invariant name FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient is either not registerd in the machine or application config file, or could not be loaded. See the inner exception for details. (Notice that the message is saying that it cant find the invariant name in machine or application config file, as I mentioned I deleted it from machine config, but it exists in the application config as you have it in your sample solution) Setting the DbProviderFactories in machine.config, results in the edmx showing up (but again I cannot do an "Update model from database", select firebird from database connections, and so on) additional to the lack of design time, I am also not able to run the application because its telling me its finding the invariant name twice - in machine/app config. Message: An exception of type 'System.Configuration.ConfigurationErrorsException' occurred in System.Configuration.dll but was not handled in user code Additional information:An error occurred creating the configuration section handler for "system.data".: The column 'InvariantName' has to be unique. The value 'FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient' exists already. Than deleting the entry in app.config and soley relying on the entry in machine.config, results in edmx gets opened (but still the design support is broke no update model, no firebird selection in db connections, and so on...), and again not able to run the application this time getting the error: An exception of type 'System.InvalidOperationException' occurred in System.Data.dll but was not handled in user code Additional information: The requested .Net Framework Data Provider's implementation does not have an Instance field of a System.Data.Common.DbProviderFactory derived type. So to atleast have a displaying model and a running application, I have now done the following. I have the DbProviderFactories in both machine.config and app.config, in app.config I have added the following line to DbProviderFactories: <remove invariant="FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient" /> The whole thing looks like this now: <system.data> <DbProviderFactories> <remove invariant="FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient" /> <add name="FirebirdClient Data Provider" invariant="FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient" description=".NET Framework Data Provider for Firebird" type="FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient.FirebirdClientFactory, FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient"/> </DbProviderFactories> </system.data> This solution is far from being perfect, all the problems with the designer still exist "Update model from database", cant pick firebird as a new database connection, when I have edmx open my error list shows the error: The requested .Net Framework Data Provider's implementation does not have an Instance field of a System.Data.Common.DbProviderFactory derived type. Any help to fix the designer would be nice, since the application is running now for a while, when you first told me about FirebirdClientFactory being wrong in the providers config and it should be FbServiceProviders, from that point on I only had problems with designer which resulted into application running problems on my modfications trying to fix the designer. > Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 18:03:55 +0200 > From: di...@ci... > To: fir...@li... > Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] DbProviderServices > > Read this http://blog.cincura.net/233426-entity-framework-6-with-firebird/ > and *understand* it. Then you should be able to go thru tooling as > well. > > > -- > Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder) > http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > October Webinars: Code for Performance > Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. > Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from > the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Firebird-net-provider mailing list > Fir...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list Fir...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider |
From: Yin-So C. <yin...@gm...> - 2013-10-30 00:19:25
|
Hi all - I am trying to embed firebird (the current version) with Mono on OS X for development. After looking through what I can find I came up against this error: Using Firebird Failed: FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient.FbException: cannot attach to password database ---> cannot attach to password database --- End of inner exception stack trace --- at FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient.FbConnectionInternal.Connect () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0 at (wrapper remoting-invoke-with-check) FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient.FbConnectionInternal:Connect () at FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient.FbConnectionPool.Create () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0 at FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient.FbConnectionPool.CheckOut () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0 at (wrapper remoting-invoke-with-check) FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient.FbConnectionPool:CheckOut () at FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient.FbConnection.Open () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0 I tried to make a copy of security2.fdb and place it next to fbembed to no avail, and removing User ID/Password gives me a different error that says the connection string is either invalid or required arguments missing. This is my current connection string. ServerType=1;User ID=sysdba;Password=masterkey;Database=localhost:/opt/test.fdb And my current build directory layout. /the_app.exe /firebird.conf /firebird.log /firebird.msg /libfbclient.dylib /libfbembed.dylib /libib_util.dylib /libicudata.dylib /libicui18n.dylib /libicuuc.dylib /security2.fdb /intl/* /udf/* Any pointers for the cause and how I can proceed is greatly appreciated. -- Cheers, yc http://yinsochen.com |
From: Rand R. (JIRA) <tr...@fi...> - 2013-10-28 15:57:18
|
SqlFunctions ------------- Key: DNET-526 URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/DNET-526 Project: .NET Data provider Issue Type: Improvement Components: ADO.NET Provider Environment: Win 7 - .Net Provider 3.2.0.0 - EF6 Reporter: Rand Random Assignee: Jiri Cincura Hi. Pls have a look at the following url: https://entityframework.codeplex.com/workitem/1774 Is there such an implementation in Firebird .Net Provider? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira |
From: <ma...@la...> - 2013-10-24 19:55:39
|
You can unsubscribe yourself using the link on the bottom of every email from this list. Mark ----- Reply message ----- Van: "Carles Bayer" <car...@ho...> Aan: "Fir...@li..." <Fir...@li...> Onderwerp: [Firebird-net-provider] Erase Mailing list Datum: do, okt. 24, 2013 20:03 Hi everybody I wish than you will erase my email in your mailing list because I'm not developer 4 years ago and I'm not interested in your contents now. thank you Carles Bayer. car...@ho... Enviat des del meu iPad ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list Fir...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider |
From: Carles B. <car...@ho...> - 2013-10-24 18:03:57
|
Hi everybody I wish than you will erase my email in your mailing list because I'm not developer 4 years ago and I'm not interested in your contents now. thank you Carles Bayer. car...@ho... Enviat des del meu iPad |
From: Rand R. <ran...@ou...> - 2013-10-24 10:39:45
|
Hi. Thanks for the post on your website, I am already able to run the EF6 solution I have, but I am unable to use the edmx file. Still getting the same errors. And your post only has the following entry You might want to use the Entity Framework's designer for instance and use DDEX in which case you need to install some other parts, but the core concept is the same. Once you understand these few steps (try changing or not doing something to see what goes wrong) you should have no problems doing it. afraid to say it, but I still have problems doing it. Since I am using Model-First I rely on the entity model to work 100%. Deleting the entry out of machine.config, and only relying to app.config results in edmx file not opening as a whole. (Application is running without problems) Message: The ADO.NET provider with invariant name FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient is either not registerd in the machine or application config file, or could not be loaded. See the inner exception for details. (Notice that the message is saying that it cant find the invariant name in machine or application config file, as I mentioned I deleted it from machine config, but it exists in the application config as you have it in your sample solution) Setting the DbProviderFactories in machine.config, results in the edmx showing up (but again I cannot do an "Update model from database", select firebird from database connections, and so on) additional to the lack of design time, I am also not able to run the application because its telling me its finding the invariant name twice - in machine/app config. Message: An exception of type 'System.Configuration.ConfigurationErrorsException' occurred in System.Configuration.dll but was not handled in user code Additional information:An error occurred creating the configuration section handler for "system.data".: The column 'InvariantName' has to be unique. The value 'FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient' exists already. Than deleting the entry in app.config and soley relying on the entry in machine.config, results in edmx gets opened (but still the design support is broke no update model, no firebird selection in db connections, and so on...), and again not able to run the application this time getting the error: An exception of type 'System.InvalidOperationException' occurred in System.Data.dll but was not handled in user code Additional information: The requested .Net Framework Data Provider's implementation does not have an Instance field of a System.Data.Common.DbProviderFactory derived type. So to atleast have a displaying model and a running application, I have now done the following. I have the DbProviderFactories in both machine.config and app.config, in app.config I have added the following line to DbProviderFactories: <remove invariant="FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient" /> The whole thing looks like this now: <system.data> <DbProviderFactories> <remove invariant="FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient" /> <add name="FirebirdClient Data Provider" invariant="FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient" description=".NET Framework Data Provider for Firebird" type="FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient.FirebirdClientFactory, FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient"/> </DbProviderFactories> </system.data> This solution is far from being perfect, all the problems with the designer still exist "Update model from database", cant pick firebird as a new database connection, when I have edmx open my error list shows the error: The requested .Net Framework Data Provider's implementation does not have an Instance field of a System.Data.Common.DbProviderFactory derived type. Any help to fix the designer would be nice, since the application is running now for a while, when you first told me about FirebirdClientFactory being wrong in the providers config and it should be FbServiceProviders, from that point on I only had problems with designer which resulted into application running problems on my modfications trying to fix the designer. > Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 18:03:55 +0200 > From: di...@ci... > To: fir...@li... > Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] DbProviderServices > > Read this http://blog.cincura.net/233426-entity-framework-6-with-firebird/ > and *understand* it. Then you should be able to go thru tooling as > well. > > > -- > Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder) > http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > October Webinars: Code for Performance > Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. > Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from > the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Firebird-net-provider mailing list > Fir...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider |
From: Jiri C. <di...@ci...> - 2013-10-23 16:04:17
|
Read this http://blog.cincura.net/233426-entity-framework-6-with-firebird/ and *understand* it. Then you should be able to go thru tooling as well. -- Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder) http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com |
From: Rand R. <ran...@ou...> - 2013-10-23 12:48:28
|
So... another update from my side... I have stoped the firebirdserver services, closed my visual studios and I uninstalled DDEX, and no processs was running that was related to any firebird product (no manager, no server, no visual studio or whats so ever), but I still couldnt uninstall the assembly from the GAC. Then, I have deleted the FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient with version 3.0.2.0 from the registry under HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Installer\Assemblies\Global After this was gone I could successfully run the command gacutil -u FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient, and according to the command gacutil -l FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient no more were registered in GAC. Now I registered the EF6 Provider into the GAC, and gacutil -l FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient listed the version correctly as 3.2.0.0. Than I reinstalled the DDEX. Opened my visual studio. Opened my EDMX file and it got displayed, but running the application still results to the error saying: An exception of type 'System.InvalidOperationException' occurred in System.Data.dll but was not handled in user code Additional information: The requested .Net Framework Data Provider's implementaion does not have an Instance field of a System.Data.Common.DbProviderFactory derived type. You propably gona say that I still have mismatch in my versions, but I am clueless at this point where it could be. I have redownloaded the EF6 4.5 provider and registered it into GAC with the same result, also the dialogs to pick a database connection still doesnt hold the Firebird client. My current machine.config has the following entries: <DbProviderFactories> <add name="Microsoft SQL Server Compact Data Provider" invariant="System.Data.SqlServerCe.3.5" description=".NET Framework Data Provider for Microsoft SQL Server Compact" type="System.Data.SqlServerCe.SqlCeProviderFactory, System.Data.SqlServerCe, Version=3.5.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=89845dcd8080cc91"/> <add name="dotConnect Universal" invariant="Devart.Data.Universal" description="Devart dotConnect Universal" type="Devart.Data.Universal.UniProviderFactory, Devart.Data.Universal, Version=3.40.440.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=09af7300eec23701"/> <add name="Microsoft SQL Server Compact Data Provider 4.0" invariant="System.Data.SqlServerCe.4.0" description=".NET Framework Data Provider for Microsoft SQL Server Compact" type="System.Data.SqlServerCe.SqlCeProviderFactory, System.Data.SqlServerCe, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=89845dcd8080cc91"/> <add name="FirebirdClient Data Provider" invariant="FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient" description=".NET Framework Data Provider for Firebird" type="FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient.FbProviderServices, FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient, Version=3.2.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=3750abcc3150b00c"/> </DbProviderFactories> Would be glad if you could help me further on. (just want to mention it once more, if you think its easier to help me with a teamviewser session I am more than glad to give you access to my pc) > Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 10:54:47 +0200 > From: di...@ci... > To: fir...@li... > Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] DbProviderServices > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Rand Random <ran...@ou...> wrote: > > Do you know a way to figure out what application is using the 3.0.2.0 > > version that cant be uninstalled threw the gacutil -u command? > > Process Explorer and then close the application. > > -- > Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder) > http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > October Webinars: Code for Performance > Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. > Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from > the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Firebird-net-provider mailing list > Fir...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider |
From: Jiri C. <di...@ci...> - 2013-10-23 08:54:55
|
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Rand Random <ran...@ou...> wrote: > Do you know a way to figure out what application is using the 3.0.2.0 > version that cant be uninstalled threw the gacutil -u command? Process Explorer and then close the application. -- Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder) http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com |
From: Rand R. <ran...@ou...> - 2013-10-23 08:48:01
|
I have already put the EF6 provider into GAC but as I said 3-5 emails ago, gacutil -u FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient Tough I am still getting a message saying that the version 3.0.2.0 is still registered but cannot be uninstalled because its in use from some other application... (Maybe firebird server or Sql Manager Lite for Firebird ?!?) So I guess that 3.0.2.0 is still in GAC and cannot be uninstalled is the root of my problem. Do you know a way to figure out what application is using the 3.0.2.0 version that cant be uninstalled threw the gacutil -u command? > Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 10:11:55 +0200 > From: di...@ci... > To: fir...@li... > Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] DbProviderServices > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Rand Random <ran...@ou...> wrote: > > When I run the application EntityModel gets initialized successful, but when > > I try to run a simple LINQ query I am getting the following message: > > > > An exception of type 'System.InvalidOperationException' occurred in > > System.Data.dll but was not handled in user code > > Additional information: The requested .Net Framework Data Provider's > > implementation does not have an Instance field of a > > System.Data.Common.DbProviderFactory derived type. > > The app is using EF5, so you have version mismatch. > > > In both scenarios, I cannot add a new server (connect to database) in visual > > studio, the firebird isnt listed in this dialog (same with the Add New Item > > --> Ado .Net Entity Model when you have to pick a database and say new > > connection). > > You need to install provider into GAC (pre-EF6 or EF6 version) to make > the DDEX work. > > -- > Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder) > http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > October Webinars: Code for Performance > Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. > Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from > the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Firebird-net-provider mailing list > Fir...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider |
From: Jiri C. <di...@ci...> - 2013-10-23 08:12:50
|
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Halim Boumedjirek <hal...@ho...> wrote: > I was able to upgrade to 3.2.0 and test again but still no luck. > We are getting the same exceptions. Good. So *create a test case* and report it. -- Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder) http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com |
From: Jiri C. <di...@ci...> - 2013-10-23 08:12:09
|
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Rand Random <ran...@ou...> wrote: > When I run the application EntityModel gets initialized successful, but when > I try to run a simple LINQ query I am getting the following message: > > An exception of type 'System.InvalidOperationException' occurred in > System.Data.dll but was not handled in user code > Additional information: The requested .Net Framework Data Provider's > implementation does not have an Instance field of a > System.Data.Common.DbProviderFactory derived type. The app is using EF5, so you have version mismatch. > In both scenarios, I cannot add a new server (connect to database) in visual > studio, the firebird isnt listed in this dialog (same with the Add New Item > --> Ado .Net Entity Model when you have to pick a database and say new > connection). You need to install provider into GAC (pre-EF6 or EF6 version) to make the DDEX work. -- Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder) http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com |
From: Mark R. <ma...@la...> - 2013-10-22 17:55:10
|
On 22-10-2013 14:48, Gerdus van Zyl wrote: > Remove "role=;" from your connectionstring, don't know why but if I add > it to my working connection string it gives the same error. > FbConnectionStringBuilder is recommended to build a connectionstring. Role "" (empty string) is not the same as no role. A potential solution would be for the provider not to send the role if it is empty. Mark -- Mark Rotteveel |
From: Bradburn, G. (LNG-RDU) <gre...@le...> - 2013-10-22 14:56:44
|
Thanks. That did the trick. From: Gerdus van Zyl [mailto:ger...@gm...] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 8:48 AM To: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Error: Your user name and password are not defined. Ask your database administrator to set up a Firebird login. Remove "role=;" from your connectionstring, don't know why but if I add it to my working connection string it gives the same error. FbConnectionStringBuilder is recommended to build a connectionstring. |
From: Halim B. <hal...@ho...> - 2013-10-22 14:54:59
|
I was able to upgrade to 3.2.0 and test again but still no luck.We are getting the same exceptions. -Halim > Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 08:18:21 +0200 > From: di...@ci... > To: fir...@li... > Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] NullReferenceException in my web service application > > You should first update to 3.2.0. > > > -- > Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder) > http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > October Webinars: Code for Performance > Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. > Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from > the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Firebird-net-provider mailing list > Fir...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider |
From: Rand R. <ran...@ou...> - 2013-10-22 14:18:29
|
Its me again. :) Not sure if thats a known issue and needs some attention, but let me ask anyway. I have it now running, atleast the code runs. But I am facing problems with the designer. There are 2 kinda connected problems with this. First, when I have the following line in my machine.config <add name="FirebirdClient Data Provider" invariant="FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient" description=".NET Framework Data Provider for Firebird EF6" type="FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient.FbProviderServices, FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient, Version=3.2.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=3750abcc3150b00c"/> I can open the edmx, without problems but I cannot "Update Model from Database". When I try to do so I am getting the following: An exception of Type 'System.ArgumentException' occurred while attempting to update from database. The exception message is: 'Unable to convert runtime connection string to its design-time equivalent. Connection string: character set=UTF8;initial catalog=C:\DB.FDB;data source=localhost;user id=SYSDBA;password=masterkey'. When I run the application EntityModel gets initialized successful, but when I try to run a simple LINQ query I am getting the following message: An exception of type 'System.InvalidOperationException' occurred in System.Data.dll but was not handled in user code Additional information: The requested .Net Framework Data Provider's implementation does not have an Instance field of a System.Data.Common.DbProviderFactory derived type. This Additional Information also comes when I open the EDMX in xml format as an tooltip (mouseover). So I thought, okay neither the designer nor the execution is running smoothly so change the machine.config back to FirebirdClientFactory, but I am getting the following when I do so: I cannot open the edmx, when I double click the edmx I am getting the message The operation could not be completed. Running the same simple LINQ query from above works now without problems. In both scenarios, I cannot add a new server (connect to database) in visual studio, the firebird isnt listed in this dialog (same with the Add New Item --> Ado .Net Entity Model when you have to pick a database and say new connection). I there a way to have the designer work 100%, or do I need to wait for a new release? From: ran...@ou... To: fir...@li... Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:18:13 +0000 Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] DbProviderServices So..... After deinstalling the msi package again, checking the C:\windows\assembly once more and again seeing no firebird dll entry. I tried the console command gacutil and voila there were a dll still registered, so I uninstalled the FirebirdSql assembly myself with gacutil -u FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient Tough I am still getting a message saying that the version 3.0.2.0 is still registered but cannot be uninstalled because its in use from some other application... (Maybe firebird server or Sql Manager Lite for Firebird ?!?) Its now finally working, thanks for your patience. :D > Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 14:15:27 +0200 > From: di...@ci... > To: fir...@li... > Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] DbProviderServices > > Yes, in config you're missing the DbProviderFactories, that also > means, given the error, that the provider is loaded from somewhere > else, very likely GAC, > > > -- > Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder) > http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > October Webinars: Code for Performance > Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. > Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from > the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Firebird-net-provider mailing list > Fir...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list Fir...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider |
From: Rand R. <ran...@ou...> - 2013-10-22 13:18:20
|
So..... After deinstalling the msi package again, checking the C:\windows\assembly once more and again seeing no firebird dll entry. I tried the console command gacutil and voila there were a dll still registered, so I uninstalled the FirebirdSql assembly myself with gacutil -u FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient Tough I am still getting a message saying that the version 3.0.2.0 is still registered but cannot be uninstalled because its in use from some other application... (Maybe firebird server or Sql Manager Lite for Firebird ?!?) Its now finally working, thanks for your patience. :D > Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 14:15:27 +0200 > From: di...@ci... > To: fir...@li... > Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] DbProviderServices > > Yes, in config you're missing the DbProviderFactories, that also > means, given the error, that the provider is loaded from somewhere > else, very likely GAC, > > > -- > Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder) > http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > October Webinars: Code for Performance > Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. > Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from > the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Firebird-net-provider mailing list > Fir...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider |
From: Gerdus v. Z. <ger...@gm...> - 2013-10-22 12:48:32
|
Remove "role=;" from your connectionstring, don't know why but if I add it to my working connection string it gives the same error. FbConnectionStringBuilder is recommended to build a connectionstring. <http://about.me/gerdus> |
From: Jiri C. <di...@ci...> - 2013-10-22 12:15:37
|
Yes, in config you're missing the DbProviderFactories, that also means, given the error, that the provider is loaded from somewhere else, very likely GAC, -- Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder) http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com |