Menu
▾
▴
firebird-net-provider — All about development of the MS .Net provider
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(55) |
Dec
(36) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(38) |
Feb
(108) |
Mar
(79) |
Apr
(95) |
May
(64) |
Jun
(130) |
Jul
(146) |
Aug
(121) |
Sep
(96) |
Oct
(149) |
Nov
(161) |
Dec
(113) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(113) |
Feb
(163) |
Mar
(248) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(157) |
Jun
(160) |
Jul
(236) |
Aug
(284) |
Sep
(293) |
Oct
(277) |
Nov
(257) |
Dec
(356) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(203) |
Feb
(190) |
Mar
(220) |
Apr
(165) |
May
(124) |
Jun
(160) |
Jul
(190) |
Aug
(142) |
Sep
(152) |
Oct
(189) |
Nov
(187) |
Dec
(159) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(170) |
Feb
(151) |
Mar
(212) |
Apr
(262) |
May
(226) |
Jun
(196) |
Jul
(223) |
Aug
(165) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(348) |
Nov
(225) |
Dec
(141) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(261) |
Feb
(161) |
Mar
(222) |
Apr
(193) |
May
(121) |
Jun
(157) |
Jul
(151) |
Aug
(159) |
Sep
(61) |
Oct
(123) |
Nov
(172) |
Dec
(96) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(104) |
Feb
(138) |
Mar
(131) |
Apr
(131) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(107) |
Jul
(89) |
Aug
(89) |
Sep
(172) |
Oct
(158) |
Nov
(119) |
Dec
(86) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(52) |
Feb
(84) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(83) |
May
(54) |
Jun
(79) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(62) |
Sep
(50) |
Oct
(147) |
Nov
(50) |
Dec
(70) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(135) |
Feb
(113) |
Mar
(74) |
Apr
(93) |
May
(35) |
Jun
(71) |
Jul
(33) |
Aug
(110) |
Sep
(47) |
Oct
(18) |
Nov
(61) |
Dec
(34) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(46) |
Feb
(47) |
Mar
(25) |
Apr
(24) |
May
(21) |
Jun
(22) |
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(51) |
Sep
(31) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(22) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(31) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(25) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(33) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(32) |
Oct
(25) |
Nov
(52) |
Dec
(35) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(43) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(36) |
Apr
(45) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(31) |
Aug
(24) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
(59) |
Nov
(47) |
Dec
(25) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(27) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(24) |
Aug
(28) |
Sep
(16) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(44) |
Dec
(40) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(52) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(18) |
Aug
(41) |
Sep
(71) |
Oct
(60) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(43) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(60) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
(21) |
Apr
(28) |
May
(23) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(37) |
Sep
(33) |
Oct
(15) |
Nov
(22) |
Dec
(20) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(27) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(48) |
Apr
(19) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(19) |
Aug
(36) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(17) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
| 2019 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(16) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(8) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Alessandro P. <pet...@in...> - 2003-07-14 10:52:49
|
"Carlos Guzman Alvarez" <car...@te...> wrote in message news:3F1...@te...... > Hello: > > > Comments are wellcome > > Huummmm ..... I'm thinking on stop 1.1 developement and center efforts > on the 1.5 with the new GDS implementation, at this moment there are > only two mayor issues in the code of the 1.5: > > 1. There are no documentation comments because i'm not sure if i'm > going to mantain it in external files or not. > > 2. Implicit transaction are not implemented yet because i'm thinking on > test the Autocommit mode of Firebird. > > > Any comments ?? Leave the 1.1 as is and continue with the 1.5. Right now I'm still using (with success) the 1.0 and can't see any reason to move to the 1.1 (except for C#Builder needs). Just my 2cents. Ciao, Alessandro Petrelli. |
|
From: Carlos G. A. <car...@te...> - 2003-07-14 10:41:13
|
Hello: > Comments are wellcome Huummmm ..... I'm thinking on stop 1.1 developement and center efforts on the 1.5 with the new GDS implementation, at this moment there are only two mayor issues in the code of the 1.5: 1. There are no documentation comments because i'm not sure if i'm going to mantain it in external files or not. 2. Implicit transaction are not implemented yet because i'm thinking on test the Autocommit mode of Firebird. Any comments ?? -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain |
|
From: Carlos G. A. <car...@te...> - 2003-07-14 08:06:18
|
Hello: > I test my little .aspx program with the xsp-Server of mono. it works. It may > be a problem of the mod_mon and/or Apache Configuration. Huummm .... I can suggest you to to build mod_mono sources using mono 0.25, have you tryed it?? and test the aspx page. -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain |
|
From: Soernt P. <soe...@t-...> - 2003-07-14 07:38:04
|
Hello Carlos I test my little .aspx program with the xsp-Server of mono. it works. It may be a problem of the mod_mon and/or Apache Configuration. Best regards Sörnt "Soernt Poppe" <Soe...@t-...> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:002a01c349d2$58d72380$0a02a8c0@pcsoernt... > Hello Carlos, > > I wrote a Console test programm - it works on Windows and mono. > I looked at apache's error.log and found this: > > [Mon Jul 14 08:09:13 2003] [warn] pid file /usr/local/apache2/logs/httpd.pid > overwritten -- Unclean shutdown of pr > > Unhandled Exception: System.ArgumentException: index is greater than or > equal to the source ArrayList.Count > in <0x0011e> 00 System.Collections.ArrayList:CopyTo > (int,System.Array,int,int) > in <0x00050> 00 .SyncArrayList:CopyTo (int,System.Array,int,int) > in <0x000fb> 00 FirebirdSql.Data.Firebird.ConnectionPool:CleanUp (object) > in <0x0004a> 00 FirebirdSql.Data.Firebird.ConnectionPool:RunCleanUp () > in <0x00053> 01 System.MulticastDelegate:invoke_void () > > Any Idea? > > Best regards > > Sörnt > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Carlos Guzman Alvarez" <car...@te...> > To: "Soernt Poppe" <Soe...@t-...> > Cc: <fir...@li...> > Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 8:51 PM > Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Unable to complete network request to > host "XXX" on Linux. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Carlos Guzman Alvarez" <car...@te...> > To: "Soernt Poppe" <Soe...@t-...> > Cc: <fir...@li...> > Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 8:51 PM > Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Unable to complete network request to > host "XXX" on Linux. > > > > Hello: > > > > > Any Idea? > > > > Can you try a Console test program for see if it can connect in linux > > using mono 0.25 ?? > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards > > > > Carlos Guzmán Álvarez > > Vigo-Spain > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft > > Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. > > Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. > > www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1 > > _______________________________________________ > > Firebird-net-provider mailing list > > Fir...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft > Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. > Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. > www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1 > _______________________________________________ > Firebird-net-provider mailing list > Fir...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider > |
|
From: <Soe...@t-...> - 2003-07-14 06:37:31
|
Hello Carlos, I wrote a Console test programm - it works on Windows and mono. I looked at apache's error.log and found this: [Mon Jul 14 08:09:13 2003] [warn] pid file /usr/local/apache2/logs/httpd.pid overwritten -- Unclean shutdown of pr Unhandled Exception: System.ArgumentException: index is greater than or equal to the source ArrayList.Count in <0x0011e> 00 System.Collections.ArrayList:CopyTo (int,System.Array,int,int) in <0x00050> 00 .SyncArrayList:CopyTo (int,System.Array,int,int) in <0x000fb> 00 FirebirdSql.Data.Firebird.ConnectionPool:CleanUp (object) in <0x0004a> 00 FirebirdSql.Data.Firebird.ConnectionPool:RunCleanUp () in <0x00053> 01 System.MulticastDelegate:invoke_void () Any Idea? Best regards Sörnt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Carlos Guzman Alvarez" <car...@te...> To: "Soernt Poppe" <Soe...@t-...> Cc: <fir...@li...> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 8:51 PM Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Unable to complete network request to host "XXX" on Linux. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Carlos Guzman Alvarez" <car...@te...> To: "Soernt Poppe" <Soe...@t-...> Cc: <fir...@li...> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 8:51 PM Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Unable to complete network request to host "XXX" on Linux. > Hello: > > > Any Idea? > > Can you try a Console test program for see if it can connect in linux > using mono 0.25 ?? > > > > > > -- > Best regards > > Carlos Guzmán Álvarez > Vigo-Spain > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft > Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. > Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. > www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1 > _______________________________________________ > Firebird-net-provider mailing list > Fir...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider |
|
From: Carlos G. A. <car...@te...> - 2003-07-13 18:51:27
|
Hello: > Any Idea? Can you try a Console test program for see if it can connect in linux using mono 0.25 ?? -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain |
|
From: <Soe...@t-...> - 2003-07-13 15:43:12
|
Hi,=20 my configuration of my Linux PC is: RH9 + apache 2.0.46 + mono 0.25 + mod_mon 0.3 + FB Superserver 1.5 RC 3 = + FB.Net-Provider 1.1 Alpha2=20 my configruation of my windows PC is XP-Prof + SP1 + Visual Studio.Net + IIS + FB.Net-Provider 1.1 Alpha2=20 I wrote a litte test .aspx Application that tries to connect to the = Firebird Server on my Linux PC. The Connection string is: = User=3DSYSDBA;Password=3Dmasterkey;Role=3D;Database=3D/ib_dbs/music.fdb;S= erver=3D192.168.2.1;Port=3D3050;Dialect=3D3;Charset=3D;Connection = lifetime=3D15;Pooling=3Dtrue It works fine on my Window PC, but with the same Connection String on my = Linux PC I get the message : FirebirdSql.Data.Firebird.FbException: Unable to complete network = request to host "192.168.2.1". ---> FirebirdSql.Data.INGDS.GDSException: Exception of type = FirebirdSql.Data.INGDS.GDSException was thrown. Even when I use Server=3D127.0.0.01 or Server=3Dlocalhost.=20 Any Idea? regards S=F6rnt |
|
From: Carlos G. A. <car...@te...> - 2003-07-13 14:28:55
|
Hello: I think it's fixed now, in CVS in both branches 1.0 and 1.1, i will try to give some more testing to the fix later today, thanks very much. -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain |
|
From: Carlos G. A. <car...@te...> - 2003-07-13 11:05:18
|
Hello: > When I execute the method ExecuteScalar() twice on the same FbCommand > within the same transaction (without changing anything on the FbCommand > instance), an exception is thrown with the message "Attempt to reopen an > open cursor" at the second call. > When I "rewrite" the statements using ExecuteReader() (and close the > reader in between the calls) everthing is oke. Is there a way I can > close the cursor in between calls of the ExecuteScalar() method or could > this be a bug? Can you send a test case ?? Which version of the .NET Provider are you using ?? -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain |
|
From: Maarten K. <mk...@xs...> - 2003-07-13 10:48:28
|
Hi, When I execute the method ExecuteScalar() twice on the same FbCommand = within the same transaction (without changing anything on the FbCommand = instance), an exception is thrown with the message "Attempt to reopen an = open cursor" at the second call.=20 When I "rewrite" the statements using ExecuteReader() (and close the = reader in between the calls) everthing is oke. Is there a way I can = close the cursor in between calls of the ExecuteScalar() method or could = this be a bug? Kind regards, Maarten Kroon |
|
From: Carlos G. A. <car...@te...> - 2003-07-13 10:24:51
|
Hello: I'm finishing first stage of the reorganization of the GDS implementation for 1.5 version, the new GDS has the next files: GdsArray.cs GdsAsciiBlob.cs GdsAttachement.cs GdsAttachParams.cs GdsBinaryBlob.cs GdsBlob.cs GdsCharset.cs GdsCharsetCollection.cs GdsCodes.cs GdsDbAttachement.cs GdsDecodeType.cs GdsDpbBuffer.cs GdsEncodeType.cs GdsEpbBuffer.cs GdsError.cs GdsErrorCollection.cs GdsEvent.cs GdsEvtAttachement.cs GdsException.cs GdsExceptionHelper.cs GdsField.cs ( XSQLVAR.cs in 1.1 ) GdsInetReader.cs GdsInetWriter.cs GdsLayouts.cs GdsResponse.cs GdsRowDescription.cs ( XSQLDA.cs in 1.1 ) GdsSlice.cs GdsSpbBuffer.cs GdsStatement.cs GdsStatementState.cs GdsSvcAttachement.cs GdsTransaction.cs As a result of the reorganization next files are no more needed and i have deleted it: Blob.cs ( GdsBlob in 1.5 ) FbArray.cs ( GdsArray in 1.5 ) FbBlob.cs ( GdsBinaryBlob in 1.5 ) FbClob.cs ( GdsAsciiBlob in 1.5 ) FbField.cs FbMetaData.cs FbParameterBlock.cs FbResultSet.cs FbStatement.cs The size of the dll are: FirebirdSql.Data.Firebird.1.1.dll -> 276KB FirebirdSql.Data.Firebird.1.5.dll -> 244KB Now i'm trying to run all NUnit test with the 1.5. Comments are wellcome -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain |
|
From: Carlos G. A. <car...@te...> - 2003-07-12 07:42:01
|
Hello: > Version 1.0.1241.28320 Can you give a try with latest CVS sources of 1.1 version ?? There are some little changes in the design time support, if you have the same problem with it tell to me :). -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain |
|
From: Alan M. <al...@me...> - 2003-07-11 22:49:12
|
Version 1.0.1241.28320 Alan > -----Original Message----- > From: fir...@li... > [mailto:fir...@li...]On Behalf= Of > Carlos Guzman Alvarez > Sent: Friday, 11 July 2003 11:23 PM > To: Alan McDonald > Cc: Firebird .Net Provider > Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] C#Builder > > > Hello: > > > I am just trying to get a test of the .NET driver in the > C#Builder personal > > trial... I have install the driver assemblies and can add a > connection and > > command to a form. I can't seem to escape the fact that the prope= rty for > > commandtype has to be > > > > System.Data.CommandType.TableDirect > > or > > System.Data.CommandType.StoreProcedure > > or > > System.Data.CommandType.Text > > > > and all throw exceptions. > > What might be the correct commandType (and Builder seems to overw= rite my > > code each time I try to change it - gotta work that out too :-) > > Which version of the .NET Provider are you using ??? > > > > -- > Best regards > > Carlos Guzm=E1n =C1lvarez > Vigo-Spain > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft > Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. > Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. > www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1 > _______________________________________________ > Firebird-net-provider mailing list > Fir...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider |
|
From: Carlos G. A. <car...@te...> - 2003-07-11 13:23:13
|
Hello: > I am just trying to get a test of the .NET driver in the C#Builder personal > trial... I have install the driver assemblies and can add a connection and > command to a form. I can't seem to escape the fact that the property for > commandtype has to be > > System.Data.CommandType.TableDirect > or > System.Data.CommandType.StoreProcedure > or > System.Data.CommandType.Text > > and all throw exceptions. > What might be the correct commandType (and Builder seems to overwrite my > code each time I try to change it - gotta work that out too :-) Which version of the .NET Provider are you using ??? -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain |
|
From: Alan M. <al...@me...> - 2003-07-11 12:37:16
|
I am just trying to get a test of the .NET driver in the C#Builder personal trial... I have install the driver assemblies and can add a connection and command to a form. I can't seem to escape the fact that the property for commandtype has to be System.Data.CommandType.TableDirect or System.Data.CommandType.StoreProcedure or System.Data.CommandType.Text and all throw exceptions. What might be the correct commandType (and Builder seems to overwrite my code each time I try to change it - gotta work that out too :-) Alan |
|
From: Carlos G. A. <car...@te...> - 2003-07-11 09:36:40
|
Hello:
> Are you going to add Visual Studio designer support ?
> I mean popup menu item "Generate DataSet", "Configure DataAdapter" when clicking on SqlDataAdapter or OleDbDataAdapter in Visual Studio designer.
> Are you planning to add features like this to FbDataProvider ?
Yes i'm thinking on it, see my last message in the net provider list
("Developement status report")
--
Best regards
Carlos Guzma'n A'lvarez
Vigo-Spain
|
|
From: Carlos G. A. <car...@te...> - 2003-07-11 09:26:15
|
Hello: After some time thinking on it i have decided to rewrite the GDS implementation, i decide this after see the result of the implementation of the protocol of a Data Provider for other RDBMS i have been developed since past month, i think that with the rewrite the GDS will more clear an easy of mantain and i expect faster too. The new GDS implementation will be included in 1.5 version ( i'm starting to work in it yet ), i'm planning to add for this version classes for metadata extraction, that will be accessed from a GetDbSchema method of FbConnection ( like for OleDb provider ) and some design time support for VS.NET ( non decided yet but i think this will be interesting ), but main objective is to rewrite the GDS implementation. This rewrite will affect only to internal classes, ADO.NET classes will expose the same members as in version 1.1. With this in mind the next version of the 1.1 branch will be Beta 1 and developement will be feature freeze and only bug fixes will accepted for this, probably there will be one more beta version and at least 3 release candidates. Comments are welcome !! :D -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain |
|
From: <pre...@bk...> - 2003-07-11 08:57:35
|
Hello. Are you going to add Visual Studio designer support ? I mean popup menu item "Generate DataSet", "Configure DataAdapter" when clicking on SqlDataAdapter or OleDbDataAdapter in Visual Studio designer. Are you planning to add features like this to FbDataProvider ? |
|
From: Carlos G. A. <car...@te...> - 2003-07-10 10:59:09
|
Hello: > in any case i would try to have it finished as soon as possible. Latest version of the script in the CVS it's working for me now, you need to configure the config file of nant ( in the bin directory of nant installation ) for use the mono-0.25 release, add mono lib directory to the path, open a msdos console, go to the net-provider directory, execute monobasepath.bat file and type: nant -f:firebirdnetprovider_mono.build.win32 -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain |
|
From: Carlos G. A. <car...@te...> - 2003-07-10 09:58:04
|
Hello: > I don't see what is different now. My question is if somebody now > why this exception could be thrown? Who and why an operation can > be cancelled? Can you send a test case ?? Which version of the .NET Provider are you sing 1.0 or 1.1 ?? -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain |
|
From: Carlos G. A. <car...@te...> - 2003-07-10 09:54:27
|
Hello: > I downloaded latest Nant from nant.sourceforge.net but without further > mangling > it seems to require MSFT .NET. Also the Nant chapter of the Mono tutorial is > still > empty. I have added to the CVS in the branch of the 1.1 version sources, aNant script for Mono in Windows but it's not finished yet. > Why do make the compiled Provider only available as an Installer requiring > MSFT .NET? Because the installer used works only with MS .NET :) and because Mono has no stable version, when it reaches version 1.0 i will provide binary versions for both windows and linux, until that there are a makefile for built the sources in Linux with mono and now there are a Nant script for mono in Windows, as i tell before it's not finished yet it's giving me a strange problem, if you can test it and tell to me if it works for you it would be great!! in any case i would try to have it finished as soon as possible. -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain |
|
From: Quedem A. N. <qu...@ho...> - 2003-07-10 09:51:09
|
<html><div style='background-color:'><FONT size=2> <P>Hi all,</P> <P>I have a weird situation where:</P> <P>I am doing an insert in one of the tables with class to do it.</P> <P>Using nunit to test it and it inserts properly. Now I am trying </P> <P>to use this method in my code and suddenly when I am doing:</P> <P>int _result = _command.ExecuteNonQuery();</P> <P>A FbException is thrown:</P> <P>"operation was cancelled"</P> <P>at FirebirdSql.Data.Firebird.FbCommand.ExecuteNonQuery()</P> <P>with an inner exception:</P> <P>"Exception of type FirebirdSql.Data.INGDS.GDSException was thrown."</P> <P>I don't see what is different now. My question is if somebody now</P> <P>why this exception could be thrown? Who and why an operation can </P> <P>be cancelled?</P> <P>Regards,</P> <P>Jesus</P></FONT></div><br clear=all><hr>Accede al romance onine. Descubre gente que busca a otra gente en <a href="http://g.msn.com/8HMTESES/2737??PS=">MSN Amor & Amistad.</a> </html> |
|
From: Peter J. <pet...@gm...> - 2003-07-10 09:13:00
|
Hi Carlos, All, Thanks for your advice: > > Is Cygwin also needed to use FirebirdNETProvider on Mono/Win32? > > No, you can use Nant (nant.sourceforge.net), you only need to modify the > build file for use mono ( mcs ) instead of csc. I downloaded latest Nant from nant.sourceforge.net but without further mangling it seems to require MSFT .NET. Also the Nant chapter of the Mono tutorial is still empty. So, I (once again) kindly request: Can anybody make a compiled Firebird NetProvider available? I really just wanted to experiment with the quickstart example in the Mono tutorial and find it rather unnerving that I have to reconstruct an entire tool chain. Why do make the compiled Provider only available as an Installer requiring MSFT .NET? Regards, Peter Jacobi -- +++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++ Jetzt ein- oder umsteigen und USB-Speicheruhr als Prämie sichern! |
|
From: Carlos G. A. <car...@te...> - 2003-07-09 12:09:44
|
Hello: > For example, the FB provider is more > particular about requiring transactions than Sql > provider, This have little changes in version 1.1 sources in CVS, now it's no needed to start a transaction for a SELECT query :) -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain |
|
From: Jason V. <jas...@ya...> - 2003-07-09 12:05:31
|
While I can't quite answer your precise question, I am developing applications for both MS SQL and Firebird side by side in C++ with managed extensions, where objects provide an abstraction between application code and the ADO.NET interface for either engine (with provisions for ODBC providers). What I've found so far is that while there are specific differences in the server or provider, Firebird and the FB provider are generally very similar in features, it's just the details that vary slightly. For example, the FB provider is more particular about requiring transactions than Sql provider, the data type enumerations are different, and the collection of meta-data is slightly different between the servers. It's my opinion that for any situation where even slight differences exist, object abstraction is indicated (even though it seems that ADO.NET is an abstaction, it's not a consistent abstraction and therefore fails to provide application code a single interface). __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com |
211 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
