Menu
▾
▴
firebird-net-provider — All about development of the MS .Net provider
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(55) |
Dec
(36) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(38) |
Feb
(108) |
Mar
(79) |
Apr
(95) |
May
(64) |
Jun
(130) |
Jul
(146) |
Aug
(121) |
Sep
(96) |
Oct
(149) |
Nov
(161) |
Dec
(113) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(113) |
Feb
(163) |
Mar
(248) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(157) |
Jun
(160) |
Jul
(236) |
Aug
(284) |
Sep
(293) |
Oct
(277) |
Nov
(257) |
Dec
(356) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(203) |
Feb
(190) |
Mar
(220) |
Apr
(165) |
May
(124) |
Jun
(160) |
Jul
(190) |
Aug
(142) |
Sep
(152) |
Oct
(189) |
Nov
(187) |
Dec
(159) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(170) |
Feb
(151) |
Mar
(212) |
Apr
(262) |
May
(226) |
Jun
(196) |
Jul
(223) |
Aug
(165) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(348) |
Nov
(225) |
Dec
(141) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(261) |
Feb
(161) |
Mar
(222) |
Apr
(193) |
May
(121) |
Jun
(157) |
Jul
(151) |
Aug
(159) |
Sep
(61) |
Oct
(123) |
Nov
(172) |
Dec
(96) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(104) |
Feb
(138) |
Mar
(131) |
Apr
(131) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(107) |
Jul
(89) |
Aug
(89) |
Sep
(172) |
Oct
(158) |
Nov
(119) |
Dec
(86) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(52) |
Feb
(84) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(83) |
May
(54) |
Jun
(79) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(62) |
Sep
(50) |
Oct
(147) |
Nov
(50) |
Dec
(70) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(135) |
Feb
(113) |
Mar
(74) |
Apr
(93) |
May
(35) |
Jun
(71) |
Jul
(33) |
Aug
(110) |
Sep
(47) |
Oct
(18) |
Nov
(61) |
Dec
(34) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(46) |
Feb
(47) |
Mar
(25) |
Apr
(24) |
May
(21) |
Jun
(22) |
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(51) |
Sep
(31) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(22) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(31) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(25) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(33) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(32) |
Oct
(25) |
Nov
(52) |
Dec
(35) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(43) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(36) |
Apr
(45) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(31) |
Aug
(24) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
(59) |
Nov
(47) |
Dec
(25) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(27) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(24) |
Aug
(28) |
Sep
(16) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(44) |
Dec
(40) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(52) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(18) |
Aug
(41) |
Sep
(71) |
Oct
(60) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(43) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(60) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
(21) |
Apr
(28) |
May
(23) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(37) |
Sep
(33) |
Oct
(15) |
Nov
(22) |
Dec
(20) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(27) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(48) |
Apr
(19) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(19) |
Aug
(36) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(17) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
| 2019 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(16) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(8) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Геннадий З. <zab...@gm...> - 2015-06-16 06:25:15
|
you can also add helper method "Add(FbScript scrip)" to support current ctor. On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Jiří Činčura <ji...@ci...> wrote: > Thinking more about it. Maybe the ctor should be only with optional FbConnection and the rest can be done via SqlStatements property. Then it's not tied to FbScript at all. > > Maybe then the FbStatementCollection can have a simple "helper" method "Add(FbStatementCollection)" (or something like that). Then it would look like: > > var batchExecution = new FbBatchExceution(); > batchExecution.Statements.Add(script.Results); //maybe rename Results > Statements??? > batchExecution.Execute(); > > Looks good to me. > > -- > Mgr. Jiří Činčura > Independent IT Specialist > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jiří Činčura >> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 3:36 PM >> To: fir...@li... >> Subject: FbBatchExecution >> >> Hi guys, >> >> Looking at FbBatchExecution's ctor I don't see a reason why it takes >> FbScript. It should rather be FbStatementCollection I think. The >> FbBatchExecution is doing nothing with the FbScript. It just needs >> commands. >> >> What do you think? I would add another overload to ctor and make the one >> with FbScript obsolete. >> >> -- >> Mgr. Jiří Činčura >> Independent IT Specialist > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Firebird-net-provider mailing list > Fir...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider |
|
From: Геннадий З. <zab...@gm...> - 2015-06-16 06:16:21
|
Use Linq^ string[] tables = .... .... LockTables = tables.ToDictionary(x=>x, FbTransactionBehavior.LockRead | FbTransactionBehavior.Exclusive) But this will cause all table to have same FbTransactionBehavior. On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Jiří Činčura <ji...@ci...> wrote: > You can’t use string[]. You need to specify the locking, hence the IDictionary. > > -- > Mgr. Jiří Činčura > Independent IT Specialist > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Firebird-net-provider mailing list > Fir...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider |
|
From: Jiří Č. <ji...@ci...> - 2015-06-16 04:57:58
|
Thinking more about it. Maybe the ctor should be only with optional FbConnection and the rest can be done via SqlStatements property. Then it's not tied to FbScript at all. Maybe then the FbStatementCollection can have a simple "helper" method "Add(FbStatementCollection)" (or something like that). Then it would look like: var batchExecution = new FbBatchExceution(); batchExecution.Statements.Add(script.Results); //maybe rename Results > Statements??? batchExecution.Execute(); Looks good to me. -- Mgr. Jiří Činčura Independent IT Specialist > -----Original Message----- > From: Jiří Činčura > Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 3:36 PM > To: fir...@li... > Subject: FbBatchExecution > > Hi guys, > > Looking at FbBatchExecution's ctor I don't see a reason why it takes > FbScript. It should rather be FbStatementCollection I think. The > FbBatchExecution is doing nothing with the FbScript. It just needs > commands. > > What do you think? I would add another overload to ctor and make the one > with FbScript obsolete. > > -- > Mgr. Jiří Činčura > Independent IT Specialist |
|
From: Jiří Č. <ji...@ci...> - 2015-06-16 04:50:09
|
You can’t use string[]. You need to specify the locking, hence the IDictionary. -- Mgr. Jiří Činčura Independent IT Specialist |
|
From: LtColRDSChauhan <rds...@gm...> - 2015-06-16 02:32:29
|
Hi,
In the under mentioned code, how do I use string[] lockTables instead of
lockTable1 and lockTable2 to set LockTables.
tx = con.BeginTransaction(
new FbTransactionOptions() {
TransactionBehavior =
FbTransactionBehavior.Consistency | FbTransactionBehavior.NoWait,
LockTables = new Dictionary<string, FbTransactionBehavior> {
{lockTable1, FbTransactionBehavior.LockRead |
FbTransactionBehavior.Exclusive},
{lockTable2, FbTransactionBehavior.LockRead |
FbTransactionBehavior.Exclusive}
}
}
);
Thanks and Regards, ,
Lt Col (Retd) Rajiv D.S. Chauhan
|
|
From: Геннадий З. <zab...@gm...> - 2015-06-10 16:42:27
|
I don't use this. Though, propose looks good to me. On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Ivan Arabadzhiev <int...@un...> wrote: > I did once suggest it should take raw String, a long time ago (did a lot of > magic to embed text files to run...). Still think it has uses, but I've > mostly moved away from .net now > > 2015-06-10 16:36 GMT+03:00 Jiří Činčura <ji...@ci...>: >> >> Hi guys, >> >> Looking at FbBatchExecution's ctor I don't see a reason why it takes >> FbScript. It should rather be FbStatementCollection I think. The >> FbBatchExecution is doing nothing with the FbScript. It just needs commands. >> >> What do you think? I would add another overload to ctor and make the one >> with FbScript obsolete. >> >> -- >> Mgr. Jiří Činčura >> Independent IT Specialist >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> _______________________________________________ >> Firebird-net-provider mailing list >> Fir...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Firebird-net-provider mailing list > Fir...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider > |
|
From: Ivan A. <int...@un...> - 2015-06-10 15:38:04
|
I did once suggest it should take raw String, a long time ago (did a lot of magic to embed text files to run...). Still think it has uses, but I've mostly moved away from .net now 2015-06-10 16:36 GMT+03:00 Jiří Činčura <ji...@ci...>: > Hi guys, > > Looking at FbBatchExecution's ctor I don't see a reason why it takes > FbScript. It should rather be FbStatementCollection I think. The > FbBatchExecution is doing nothing with the FbScript. It just needs commands. > > What do you think? I would add another overload to ctor and make the one > with FbScript obsolete. > > -- > Mgr. Jiří Činčura > Independent IT Specialist > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Firebird-net-provider mailing list > Fir...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider > |
|
From: Jiří Č. <ji...@ci...> - 2015-06-10 13:36:13
|
Hi guys, Looking at FbBatchExecution's ctor I don't see a reason why it takes FbScript. It should rather be FbStatementCollection I think. The FbBatchExecution is doing nothing with the FbScript. It just needs commands. What do you think? I would add another overload to ctor and make the one with FbScript obsolete. -- Mgr. Jiří Činčura Independent IT Specialist |
|
From: Jiří Č. <ji...@ci...> - 2015-06-03 05:02:16
|
Hi, Create a PR, so it can be commented there. That’s easiest. -- Mgr. Jiří Činčura Independent IT Specialist From: Amro El-Fakharany [mailto:amr...@gm...] Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 4:29 PM To: fir...@li... Subject: [Firebird-net-provider] DNet 176 and 564 Hi all, I’m trying to provide a patch fort the mentioned Jira issues. The patch can be found here: https://github.com/amroel/NETProvider/commit/576b16bc1afcb5f8373c149f928ef62c597e5373 Would someone please review it before I submit a pull request? Jiri? Thank you Amro |
|
From: Amro El-F. <amr...@gm...> - 2015-06-02 14:28:59
|
Hi all, I'm trying to provide a patch fort the mentioned Jira issues. The patch can be found here: https://github.com/amroel/NETProvider/commit/576b16bc1afcb5f8373c149f928ef62 c597e5373 Would someone please review it before I submit a pull request? Jiri? Thank you Amro |
|
From: Christian W. <chr...@rt...> - 2015-06-01 12:52:52
|
> The installation documentation of the DDEX provider refers to *.reg files to be edited and imported. Download also the ZIP archiv, there are the .reg files |
|
From: Heine F. <hei...@gm...> - 2015-06-01 12:26:32
|
Hi, The installation documentation of the DDEX provider refers to *.reg files to be edited and imported. I looked on my local hard drive as well as on the download section of Firebird and couldn't find them. Am I overlooking something may be? Any help will be appreciated. Thanks H.F. |
|
From: Marco De S. (JIRA) <tr...@fi...> - 2015-05-31 13:53:49
|
Typo on property "DefaultConnectionLifetime" of FbConnectionString class
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: DNET-608
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/DNET-608
Project: .NET Data provider
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: ADO.NET Provider
Affects Versions: 4.6.2.0
Reporter: Marco De Salvo
Assignee: Jiri Cincura
Priority: Trivial
Typo on property "DefaultConnectionLifetime" of FbConnectionString class: it is declared as "DefautlConnectionLifetime".
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
|
|
From: Jiří Č. <ji...@ci...> - 2015-05-25 18:54:21
|
> Is it ok to use the connection of the EF context for this purpose? > > Cast it to (fbConnection)Context.Database.Connection That's absolutely fine. -- Mgr. Jiří Činčura Independent IT Specialist |
|
From: Parzival <par...@gm...> - 2015-05-25 15:08:34
|
Hello, the EF integration with Firebird works quiet well for standard insert, update, delete and search. I have still some problems arrond Stored Procedures. For that reason I keep using the .net Provider functionality with fbConnection, fbCommand etc. Is it ok to use the connection of the EF context for this purpose? Cast it to (fbConnection)Context.Database.Connection Or is there a problem by doing that? Thanks Niko |
|
From: Simon C. (JIRA) <tr...@fi...> - 2015-05-20 16:25:58
|
Pooling clears current active connections
-----------------------------------------
Key: DNET-607
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/DNET-607
Project: .NET Data provider
Issue Type: Bug
Components: ADO.NET Provider
Affects Versions: 4.6.2.0
Environment: Windows 8
Visual Studio Pro 2013
Firebird 2.5.2
Reporter: Simon Carter
Assignee: Jiri Cincura
The following method within FbConnectionPoolManager.cs
public void CleanupPool()
{
lock (_syncRoot)
{
CheckDisposedImpl();
var now = DateTimeOffset.UtcNow;
var available = _available.ToArray();
var keep = available.Where(x => IsAlive(_connectionString.ConnectionLifeTime, x.Created, now)).ToArray();
var keepCount = keep.Count();
if (keepCount < _connectionString.MinPoolSize)
keep = available.Except(keep).Take(_connectionString.MinPoolSize - keepCount).ToArray();
var release = available.Except(keep).ToArray();
release.AsParallel().ForAll(x => x.Dispose());
_available = new Queue<Item>(keep);
}
}
}
The line keep = available.Except(keep).Take(_connectionString.MinPoolSize - keepCount).ToArray(); will always clear existing connections when the number of connections is less than the Minimum Pool Size.
By removing the following lines, all works as expected:
var keepCount = keep.Count();
if (keepCount < _connectionString.MinPoolSize)
keep = available.Except(keep).Take(_connectionString.MinPoolSize - keepCount).ToArray();
Also the Take(_connectionString.MinPoolSize - keepCount) only takes account of the min pool size and not the maximum, so "other" connections above min pool size could also be lost at this point
The following is my connection string:
User=USERNAME;Password=password;Database=DBName.fdb;DataSource=127.0.0.1;Dialect=3;MinPoolSize=20;MaxPoolSize=150;Pooling=True;Connection lifetime=0;Packet Size=8192;CharSet=UTF8
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
|
|
From: William J. <bi...@te...> - 2015-05-19 13:23:01
|
A solution which worked for me was to install the NuGet package for the provider into the Visual Studio project. It will create a References item to a project local packaged dll that is included with the deployed files. Previously, I had the msi installed provider which was only resolved on my development machine. +BillJ |
|
From: <da...@na...> - 2015-05-19 08:34:49
|
Sorry I missed you e-mail but I'm currently on leave. I will return to the office on Monday the 25th of May For all support inquiries please contact the office on +353 (0)1 5253600 or +44 (0)203 4681247 Alternatively please email su...@na... . Kind Regards, David |
|
From: Jiří Č. <ji...@ci...> - 2015-05-19 08:28:13
|
Hi, If you installed the FirebirdClient form NuGet the app.config should have been updated for you automatically. -- Mgr. Jiří Činčura Independent IT Specialist > -----Original Message----- > From: Parzival [mailto:par...@gm...] > Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 7:42 AM > To: 'For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers' > Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Deployment for EF6 + Firebird .net > Application > > Hello, > > I have found a message form Jiri on his webpage that describes and solves > the problem: > > http://blog.cincura.net/7975-deploying-the-asp-net-application-which-is- > usin > g-firebird-net-data-provider-with-design-time-support/ > > Niko > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Victor Bautista [mailto:vic...@gm...] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Mai 2015 03:21 > An: fir...@li... > Betreff: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Deployment for EF6 + Firebird .net > Application > > Hi Parzival, > > You need to add the file FBCLIENT.DLL which is found in your C:\Program > Files\Firebird\Firebird_2_5\bin (or wherever your Firebird folder is). > > HTH. > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > -- > One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud > Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance > metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive > visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y > _______________________________________________ > Firebird-net-provider mailing list > Fir...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- > One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud > Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance > metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive > visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y > _______________________________________________ > Firebird-net-provider mailing list > Fir...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider |
|
From: Jiří Č. <ji...@ci...> - 2015-05-19 08:17:21
|
No you don't. -- Mgr. Jiří Činčura Independent IT Specialist > -----Original Message----- > From: Victor Bautista [mailto:vic...@gm...] > Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 3:21 AM > To: fir...@li... > Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Deployment for EF6 + Firebird .net > Application > > Hi Parzival, > > You need to add the file FBCLIENT.DLL which is found in your C:\Program > Files\Firebird\Firebird_2_5\bin (or wherever your Firebird folder is). > > HTH. > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- > One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud > Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance > metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive > visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y > _______________________________________________ > Firebird-net-provider mailing list > Fir...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider |
|
From: Parzival <par...@gm...> - 2015-05-19 05:42:33
|
Hello, I have found a message form Jiri on his webpage that describes and solves the problem: http://blog.cincura.net/7975-deploying-the-asp-net-application-which-is-usin g-firebird-net-data-provider-with-design-time-support/ Niko -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Victor Bautista [mailto:vic...@gm...] Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Mai 2015 03:21 An: fir...@li... Betreff: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Deployment for EF6 + Firebird .net Application Hi Parzival, You need to add the file FBCLIENT.DLL which is found in your C:\Program Files\Firebird\Firebird_2_5\bin (or wherever your Firebird folder is). HTH. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list Fir...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider |
|
From: Parzival <par...@gm...> - 2015-05-19 05:35:58
|
Hello Victor, I copied fbclient.dll but it did not resolve the issue. Niko -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Victor Bautista [mailto:vic...@gm...] Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Mai 2015 03:21 An: fir...@li... Betreff: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Deployment for EF6 + Firebird .net Application Hi Parzival, You need to add the file FBCLIENT.DLL which is found in your C:\Program Files\Firebird\Firebird_2_5\bin (or wherever your Firebird folder is). HTH. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list Fir...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider |
|
From: Victor B. <vic...@gm...> - 2015-05-19 02:00:14
|
Hi Parzival, You need to add the file FBCLIENT.DLL which is found in your C:\Program Files\Firebird\Firebird_2_5\bin (or wherever your Firebird folder is). HTH. |
|
From: Parzival <par...@gm...> - 2015-05-18 19:49:51
|
Hello,
I am working for some time now with EF 6.0 and Firebird (after using
Firebird for long time with ODBC etc.).
When it comes to deploying the app I am facing an interessting problem. It
runs fine on the development box, but not in VMWare or other PC. The error
claims that the FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient is missing - which is
sitting next to the app.exe.
Do you have an idea what could be missing here?
Thanks
Niko
Following files are part of the xcopy installation:
echolot.exe
echolot.exe.config
echolotdataaccess.dll (Contains the C# entity framework context)
EntityFramework.dll
EntityFrameworkFirebird.dll
FirebirdSql.Data.Firebird.Client.dll
The config file contains following items:
<configSections>
<!-- For more information on Entity Framework configuration, visit
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=237468 -->
<section name="entityFramework"
type="System.Data.Entity.Internal.ConfigFile.EntityFrameworkSection,
EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral,
PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089" requirePermission="false" />
<sectionGroup name="applicationSettings"
type="System.Configuration.ApplicationSettingsGroup, System,
Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089" >
<section name="Settings"
type="System.Configuration.ClientSettingsSection, System, Version=4.0.0.0,
Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089" requirePermission="false"
/>
</sectionGroup>
</configSections>
<entityFramework>
<defaultConnectionFactory
type="FirebirdSql.Data.EntityFramework6.FbConnectionFactory,
EntityFramework.Firebird" />
<providers>
<provider invariantName="FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient"
type="FirebirdSql.Data.EntityFramework6.FbProviderServices,
EntityFramework.Firebird" />
</providers>
</entityFramework>
The app starts and at the first time I want to query data
public IEnumerable GetMaerkte()
{
var result = from s in this.ECHOLOT_MAERKTE select new
{s.MARKT};
return result.ToList();
}
I receive following errormessage:
System.ArgumentException: The ADO.NET provider with invariant name
'FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient' is either not registered in the machine or
application config file, or could not be loaded. See the inner exception for
details. ---> System.ArgumentException: Unable to find the requested .Net
Framework Data Provider. It may not be installed.
|
|
From: Jiří Č. <ji...@ci...> - 2015-05-11 06:19:35
|
Why? EF6 provider is separate. -- Mgr. Jiří Činčura Independent IT Specialist From: Brian Liedtke [mailto:li...@fr...] Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 6:52 AM To: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Help generating an EDMX on EF6 Interesting. Reason? Would think that FirebirdClient should be compiled for Entity Framework 6. Brian From: Jiří Činčura<mailto:ji...@ci...> Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2015 10:30 PM To: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers<mailto:fir...@li...> Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Help generating an EDMX on EF6 Nope. -- Mgr. Jiří Činčura Independent IT Specialist From: Brian Liedtke [mailto:li...@fr...] Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 12:50 AM To: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Help generating an EDMX on EF6 So the EF_6 symbol should not be set for FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient? Brian From: Jiří Činčura<mailto:ji...@ci...> Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2015 4:34 AM To: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers<mailto:fir...@li...> Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Help generating an EDMX on EF6 The EF_6 is there for EntityFramework.Firebird, as there’s some shared code. -- Mgr. Jiří Činčura Independent IT Specialist |
211 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
