You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(689) |
Nov
(1145) |
Dec
(791) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(504) |
Feb
(575) |
Mar
(726) |
Apr
(934) |
May
(729) |
Jun
(715) |
Jul
(512) |
Aug
(693) |
Sep
(861) |
Oct
(691) |
Nov
(608) |
Dec
(648) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(974) |
Feb
(715) |
Mar
(546) |
Apr
(650) |
May
(367) |
Jun
(374) |
Jul
(485) |
Aug
(269) |
Sep
(313) |
Oct
(547) |
Nov
(842) |
Dec
(535) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(459) |
Feb
(485) |
Mar
(409) |
Apr
(412) |
May
(298) |
Jun
(307) |
Jul
(336) |
Aug
(277) |
Sep
(332) |
Oct
(292) |
Nov
(236) |
Dec
(204) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(265) |
Feb
(293) |
Mar
(460) |
Apr
(276) |
May
(484) |
Jun
(591) |
Jul
(409) |
Aug
(425) |
Sep
(372) |
Oct
(234) |
Nov
(236) |
Dec
(223) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(307) |
Feb
(417) |
Mar
(324) |
Apr
(217) |
May
(175) |
Jun
(161) |
Jul
(246) |
Aug
(280) |
Sep
(186) |
Oct
(188) |
Nov
(222) |
Dec
(193) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(195) |
Feb
(188) |
Mar
(164) |
Apr
(76) |
May
(157) |
Jun
(151) |
Jul
(101) |
Aug
(113) |
Sep
(99) |
Oct
(190) |
Nov
(397) |
Dec
(289) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(326) |
Feb
(203) |
Mar
(325) |
Apr
(232) |
May
(226) |
Jun
(84) |
Jul
(321) |
Aug
(209) |
Sep
(207) |
Oct
(254) |
Nov
(160) |
Dec
(224) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(195) |
Feb
(182) |
Mar
(144) |
Apr
(170) |
May
(85) |
Jun
(144) |
Jul
(133) |
Aug
(263) |
Sep
(429) |
Oct
(227) |
Nov
(281) |
Dec
(217) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(126) |
Feb
(164) |
Mar
(169) |
Apr
(175) |
May
(152) |
Jun
(258) |
Jul
(155) |
Aug
(157) |
Sep
(96) |
Oct
(151) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(111) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(96) |
Feb
(95) |
Mar
(126) |
Apr
(193) |
May
(149) |
Jun
(90) |
Jul
(195) |
Aug
(159) |
Sep
(186) |
Oct
(269) |
Nov
(184) |
Dec
(195) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(181) |
Feb
(164) |
Mar
(185) |
Apr
(277) |
May
(143) |
Jun
(220) |
Jul
(162) |
Aug
(219) |
Sep
(119) |
Oct
(151) |
Nov
(74) |
Dec
(122) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(205) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(155) |
Apr
(206) |
May
(114) |
Jun
(151) |
Jul
(104) |
Aug
(80) |
Sep
(151) |
Oct
(213) |
Nov
(263) |
Dec
(138) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(72) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(168) |
Apr
(255) |
May
(103) |
Jun
(77) |
Jul
(64) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(68) |
Oct
(178) |
Nov
(115) |
Dec
(89) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(70) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(63) |
Apr
(77) |
May
(96) |
Jun
(72) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(18) |
Sep
(91) |
Oct
(177) |
Nov
(82) |
Dec
(54) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(29) |
Apr
(22) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(37) |
Sep
(41) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(60) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(42) |
Oct
(115) |
Nov
(31) |
Dec
(13) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(27) |
Feb
(38) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(16) |
May
(11) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
(13) |
Dec
(8) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(73) |
Feb
(84) |
Mar
(105) |
Apr
(69) |
May
(51) |
Jun
(73) |
Jul
(55) |
Aug
(54) |
Sep
(40) |
Oct
(87) |
Nov
(63) |
Dec
(24) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(75) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(35) |
Apr
(33) |
May
(34) |
Jun
(22) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(37) |
Dec
(59) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(66) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(28) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(66) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(34) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(21) |
Feb
(68) |
Mar
(24) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(14) |
Jul
|
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(15) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(28) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(106) |
Feb
(36) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(47) |
Oct
(48) |
Nov
(29) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2024 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(23) |
Oct
(32) |
Nov
(14) |
Dec
(26) |
| 2025 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(36) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2026 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
(8) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Scott H. <sha...@us...> - 2026-03-29 15:49:48
|
Dan, I think I submitted a PR for lftp and the stable ncftp are both working in fink AFAIK. I use them both for my duplicity package. -Scott > On Mar 28, 2026, at 10:53 PM, Daniel Macks <dm...@ne...> wrote: > > > Probably. And OS X doesn't have an ftp CLI recently (and fink's doesn't build). > > dan > > On Sat, 28 Mar 2026 22:18:14 -0400, Scott Hannahs via Fink-users <fin...@li...> wrote: > >>> Dan, >>> >>> Thanks! Quick response! I just noticed the failed download when updating. I think almost all the ftp downloads are invalid. >>> >>> -Scott |
|
From: Daniel M. <dm...@ne...> - 2026-03-29 02:54:03
|
Probably. And OS X doesn't have an ftp CLI recently (and fink's doesn't build). dan On Sat, 28 Mar 2026 22:18:14 -0400, Scott Hannahs via Fink-users <fin...@li...> wrote: >> Dan, >> >> Thanks! Quick response! I just noticed the failed download when updating. I think almost all the ftp downloads are invalid. >> >> -Scott >> >> >> > On Mar 28, 2026, at 9:25 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: >> > >> > On Sat, 28 Mar 2026 21:11:12 -0400, Scott Hannahs via Fink-users wrote: >> > >> >>> An update to OpenSSL was just pushed to master, updating OpenSSL to version 3.6.1. However, the secondary source field in the dot-info file points to a URL that does not exist. There is no ftp.openssl.org . I have no idea how long that has been true, but as long as someone is updating it, probably should just drop that secondary source field. >> > >> > Done (applies to all openssl libversions). >> > >> > dan >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fink-users mailing list >> Fin...@li... >> List archive: >> https://sourceforge.net/p/fink/mailman/fink-users/ >> Subscription management: >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users |
|
From: Scott H. <sha...@us...> - 2026-03-29 02:18:30
|
Dan, Thanks! Quick response! I just noticed the failed download when updating. I think almost all the ftp downloads are invalid. -Scott > On Mar 28, 2026, at 9:25 PM, Daniel Macks <dm...@ne...> wrote: > > On Sat, 28 Mar 2026 21:11:12 -0400, Scott Hannahs via Fink-users <fin...@li...> wrote: > >>> An update to OpenSSL was just pushed to master, updating OpenSSL to version 3.6.1. However, the secondary source field in the dot-info file points to a URL that does not exist. There is no ftp.openssl.org . I have no idea how long that has been true, but as long as someone is updating it, probably should just drop that secondary source field. > > Done (applies to all openssl libversions). > > dan |
|
From: Daniel M. <dm...@ne...> - 2026-03-29 02:01:12
|
On Sat, 28 Mar 2026 21:11:12 -0400, Scott Hannahs via Fink-users <fin...@li...> wrote: >> An update to OpenSSL was just pushed to master, updating OpenSSL to version 3.6.1. However, the secondary source field in the dot-info file points to a URL that does not exist. There is no ftp.openssl.org . I have no idea how long that has been true, but as long as someone is updating it, probably should just drop that secondary source field. Done (applies to all openssl libversions). dan |
|
From: Scott H. <sha...@us...> - 2026-03-29 01:11:26
|
An update to OpenSSL was just pushed to master, updating OpenSSL to version 3.6.1. However, the secondary source field in the dot-info file points to a URL that does not exist. There is no ftp.openssl.org <http://ftp.openssl.org/>. I have no idea how long that has been true, but as long as someone is updating it, probably should just drop that secondary source field. -Scott |
|
From: Scott H. <sha...@us...> - 2026-03-11 18:16:00
|
Robert, Thanks, I should look at my own notes. I had tried to bootstrap a new installation rather than inject an update. -Scott > On Mar 6, 2026, at 12:03, Robert Wyatt <chu...@gm...> wrote: > > In my Notes app I keep this information, which works for me, currently "fink selfupdate -git" is also working for me: > > the following should update your fink installation: > mkdir -p ~/src > cd src > git clone https://github.com/fink/fink fink-upstream > cd fink-upstream > git pull > sudo cp perlmod/Fink/Services.pm /opt/sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Services.pm > ./inject.pl > > > OR: > > date; cd ~/src/fink-upstream; git pull; sudo cp perlmod/Fink/Services.pm /opt/sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Services.pm; ./inject.pl; date; cd ~/ > > > Let us know if it works! > Robert > > > >> On Mar 6, 2026, at 8:39 AM, Scott Hannahs via Fink-users <fin...@li...> wrote: >> >> So, I updated to Tahoe after waiting for many months. And I injected the new fink file Services.pm so all should be well. >> >> BUT, if I do a self-update, fink tries to update fink and reverts the Services.pm file and fails. Likewise any build that requires fink tries to update fink and thus fails. Fink is version 0.45.99 but the database says it is not installed, so it tries to install it again leading to failure. >> >> The same issue arises if I try to bootstrap a new version of fink. Or even if I use dpkg to install the fink deb file directly. Somehow fink does not know that it is already installed. >> >> Do I need to create a new OS version 26 fink install package that patches the Services.pm file? I really didn’t want to get to that point, but that is all I have left. >> >> -Scott |
|
From: Robert W. <chu...@gm...> - 2026-03-06 17:03:25
|
In my Notes app I keep this information, which works for me, currently "fink selfupdate -git" is also working for me: the following should update your fink installation: mkdir -p ~/src cd src git clone https://github.com/fink/fink fink-upstream cd fink-upstream git pull sudo cp perlmod/Fink/Services.pm /opt/sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Services.pm ./inject.pl OR: date; cd ~/src/fink-upstream; git pull; sudo cp perlmod/Fink/Services.pm /opt/sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Services.pm; ./inject.pl; date; cd ~/ Let us know if it works! Robert > On Mar 6, 2026, at 8:39 AM, Scott Hannahs via Fink-users <fin...@li...> wrote: > > So, I updated to Tahoe after waiting for many months. And I injected the new fink file Services.pm so all should be well. > > BUT, if I do a self-update, fink tries to update fink and reverts the Services.pm file and fails. Likewise any build that requires fink tries to update fink and thus fails. Fink is version 0.45.99 but the database says it is not installed, so it tries to install it again leading to failure. > > The same issue arises if I try to bootstrap a new version of fink. Or even if I use dpkg to install the fink deb file directly. Somehow fink does not know that it is already installed. > > Do I need to create a new OS version 26 fink install package that patches the Services.pm file? I really didn’t want to get to that point, but that is all I have left. > > -Scott |
|
From: Scott H. <sha...@us...> - 2026-03-06 14:58:12
|
So, I updated to Tahoe after waiting for many months. And I injected the new fink file Services.pm so all should be well. BUT, if I do a self-update, fink tries to update fink and reverts the Services.pm file and fails. Likewise any build that requires fink tries to update fink and thus fails. Fink is version 0.45.99 but the database says it is not installed, so it tries to install it again leading to failure. The same issue arises if I try to bootstrap a new version of fink. Or even if I use dpkg to install the fink deb file directly. Somehow fink does not know that it is already installed. Do I need to create a new OS version 26 fink install package that patches the Services.pm file? I really didn’t want to get to that point, but that is all I have left. -Scott |
|
From: <fi...@sn...> - 2026-01-04 14:04:46
|
On 2025-12-20 13:06, Scott Hannahs via Fink-users wrote: >> On Dec 20, 2025, at 07:19, Hanspeter Niederstrasser >> <fi...@sn...> wrote: >> >> On 12/1/25 8:06 AM, Scott Hannahs via Fink-users wrote: >> >>> Looks like CERN has put cernlib on gitlab which needs a login >>> (free login) to access the source tarball. Shouldn’t the >>> distfiles servers be syncing the correct package? Having it on >>> only one server might be fragile. >> >> I tried logging in to https://gitlab.cern.ch/ and see the new >> cernlib but get unauthorized access errors. >> >> Is there any other way to get the gitlab code? If the license is >> distributable, then we can put the tarball on Sourceforge and update >> to avoid dealing with 19 year old code. >> >> Hanspeter > > Hanspeter, > > You can download the source from > https://cernlib.web.cern.ch/version.html > > Or for other information: https://cernlib.web.cern.ch/cernlib/ See here: https://github.com/fink/fink-distributions/pull/1291 It builds, but can't do anything with it besides running `foo --version` Hanspeter |
|
From: Scott H. <sha...@us...> - 2025-12-21 18:48:09
|
> On Dec 21, 2025, at 11:50, fi...@sn... wrote: > > On 2025-12-20 13:06, Scott Hannahs via Fink-users wrote: >>> On Dec 20, 2025, at 07:19, Hanspeter Niederstrasser >>> <fi...@sn...> wrote: >>> On 12/1/25 8:06 AM, Scott Hannahs via Fink-users wrote: >>>> Looks like CERN has put cernlib on gitlab which needs a login >>>> (free login) to access the source tarball. Shouldn’t the >>>> distfiles servers be syncing the correct package? Having it on >>>> only one server might be fragile. >>> I tried logging in to https://gitlab.cern.ch/ and see the new >>> cernlib but get unauthorized access errors. >>> Is there any other way to get the gitlab code? If the license is >>> distributable, then we can put the tarball on Sourceforge and update >>> to avoid dealing with 19 year old code. >>> Hanspeter >> Hanspeter, >> You can download the source from >> https://cernlib.web.cern.ch/version.html >> Or for other information: https://cernlib.web.cern.ch/cernlib/ > > > Thanks for the pointer. > > New package: dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-x86_64/sci/cernlib2025_2025.09.18.4-1_darwin-x86_64.deb > > So that's a monolithic package with everything that gets installed. Will slowly try to split if up to resemble cernlib2006. Great! That should make the users very happy! -Scott |
|
From: <fi...@sn...> - 2025-12-21 16:59:21
|
On 2025-12-20 13:06, Scott Hannahs via Fink-users wrote: >> On Dec 20, 2025, at 07:19, Hanspeter Niederstrasser >> <fi...@sn...> wrote: >> >> On 12/1/25 8:06 AM, Scott Hannahs via Fink-users wrote: >> >>> Looks like CERN has put cernlib on gitlab which needs a login >>> (free login) to access the source tarball. Shouldn’t the >>> distfiles servers be syncing the correct package? Having it on >>> only one server might be fragile. >> >> I tried logging in to https://gitlab.cern.ch/ and see the new >> cernlib but get unauthorized access errors. >> >> Is there any other way to get the gitlab code? If the license is >> distributable, then we can put the tarball on Sourceforge and update >> to avoid dealing with 19 year old code. >> >> Hanspeter > > Hanspeter, > > You can download the source from > https://cernlib.web.cern.ch/version.html > > Or for other information: https://cernlib.web.cern.ch/cernlib/ Thanks for the pointer. New package: dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-x86_64/sci/cernlib2025_2025.09.18.4-1_darwin-x86_64.deb So that's a monolithic package with everything that gets installed. Will slowly try to split if up to resemble cernlib2006. |
|
From: Scott H. <sha...@us...> - 2025-12-20 19:06:51
|
> On Dec 20, 2025, at 07:19, Hanspeter Niederstrasser <fi...@sn...> wrote: > > On 12/1/25 8:06 AM, Scott Hannahs via Fink-users wrote: >> Looks like CERN has put cernlib on gitlab which needs a login (free login) to access the source tarball. Shouldn’t the distfiles servers be syncing the correct package? Having it on only one server might be fragile. > > I tried logging in to https://gitlab.cern.ch/ and see the new cernlib but get unauthorized access errors. > > Is there any other way to get the gitlab code? If the license is distributable, then we can put the tarball on Sourceforge and update to avoid dealing with 19 year old code. > > Hanspeter Hanspeter, You can download the source from https://cernlib.web.cern.ch/version.html Or for other information: https://cernlib.web.cern.ch/cernlib/ No login required. HTH, -Scott Dr. Scott Hannahs, Chief Scientist for Scientific Instrumentation (Retired) Personal Gender Pronouns: he, him, his FSU Distinguished University Scholar National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University https://nationalmaglab.org/staff/?name=ScottHannahs "OS X: because making Unix user-friendly was easier than debugging Windows." |
|
From: Hanspeter N. <fi...@sn...> - 2025-12-20 12:26:31
|
On 12/1/25 8:06 AM, Scott Hannahs via Fink-users wrote: > Looks like CERN has put cernlib on gitlab which needs a login (free login) to access the source tarball. Shouldn’t the distfiles servers be syncing the correct package? Having it on only one server might be fragile. I tried logging in to https://gitlab.cern.ch/ and see the new cernlib but get unauthorized access errors. Is there any other way to get the gitlab code? If the license is distributable, then we can put the tarball on Sourceforge and update to avoid dealing with 19 year old code. Hanspeter -- More agile than a turtle, stronger than a mouse, nobler than lettuce |
|
From: Scott H. <sha...@us...> - 2025-12-20 05:17:33
|
Code is probably missing
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <xlocale.h>
Check if there is an upstream update.
Probably shouldn’t cross post to both fink lists. Fink Users is fine.
-Scott
> On Dec 19, 2025, at 07:38, a_sk--- via Fink-users <fin...@li...> wrote:
>
> ……….. ………..
> gcc -I. -I/opt/sw/include -Os -MT c-strtod.o -MD -MP -MF $depbase.Tpo -c -o c-strtod.o c-strtod.c &&\
> mv -f $depbase.Tpo $depbase.Po
> c-strtod.c:54:7: error: call to undeclared function 'strtod_l'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 54 | r = STRTOD_L (nptr, endptr, c_locale);
> | ^
> c-strtod.c:36:19: note: expanded from macro 'STRTOD_L'
> 36 | # define STRTOD_L strtod_l
> | ^
> 1 error generated.
> make[3]: *** [c-strtod.o] Error 1
> make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make: *** [all] Error 2
> ### execution of /usr/bin/make failed, exit code 2
> ### execution of /tmp/fink.shPCP failed, exit code 2
> ----------------------
> Xcode.app: 16.4
> Xcode command-line tools: 16.4.0.0.1.1747106510
> Max. Fink build jobs: 1
>
> (Note) this file listed on "Recent Package Updates”
> _______________________________________________
> Fink-users mailing list
> Fin...@li...
> List archive:
> https://sourceforge.net/p/fink/mailman/fink-users/
> Subscription management:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
|
|
From: <a_...@me...> - 2025-12-19 15:01:28
|
……….. ………..
gcc -I. -I/opt/sw/include -Os -MT c-strtod.o -MD -MP -MF $depbase.Tpo -c -o c-strtod.o c-strtod.c &&\
mv -f $depbase.Tpo $depbase.Po
c-strtod.c:54:7: error: call to undeclared function 'strtod_l'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
54 | r = STRTOD_L (nptr, endptr, c_locale);
| ^
c-strtod.c:36:19: note: expanded from macro 'STRTOD_L'
36 | # define STRTOD_L strtod_l
| ^
1 error generated.
make[3]: *** [c-strtod.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all] Error 2
### execution of /usr/bin/make failed, exit code 2
### execution of /tmp/fink.shPCP failed, exit code 2
----------------------
Xcode.app: 16.4
Xcode command-line tools: 16.4.0.0.1.1747106510
Max. Fink build jobs: 1
(Note) this file listed on "Recent Package Updates” |
|
From: <a_...@me...> - 2025-12-19 13:06:39
|
(Resent correct title)
gcc -I. -I/opt/sw/include -Os -MT c-strtod.o -MD -MP -MF $depbase.Tpo -c -o c-strtod.o c-strtod.c &&\
mv -f $depbase.Tpo $depbase.Po
c-strtod.c:54:7: error: call to undeclared function 'strtod_l'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
54 | r = STRTOD_L (nptr, endptr, c_locale);
| ^
c-strtod.c:36:19: note: expanded from macro 'STRTOD_L'
36 | # define STRTOD_L strtod_l
| ^
1 error generated.
make[3]: *** [c-strtod.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all] Error 2
### execution of /usr/bin/make failed, exit code 2
### execution of /tmp/fink.shPCP failed, exit code 2
----------------------
Xcode.app: 16.4
Xcode command-line tools: 16.4.0.0.1.1747106510
Max. Fink build jobs: 1
(Note) this file listed on "Recent Package Updates” |
|
From: Scott H. <sha...@us...> - 2025-12-07 01:18:31
|
Type conversion error.
../deps/v8/src/base/macros.h:245:32: warning: builtin __has_trivial_destructor is deprecated; use __is_trivially_destructible instead [-Wdeprecated-builtins]
245 | __has_trivial_copy(T) && __has_trivial_destructor(T);
| ^
In file included from ../deps/v8/src/api/api-arguments.cc:5:
In file included from ../deps/v8/src/api/api-arguments.h:8:
In file included from ../deps/v8/src/api/api.h:9:
In file included from ../deps/v8/src/execution/isolate.h:24:
In file included from ../deps/v8/src/execution/isolate-data.h:10:
In file included from ../deps/v8/src/codegen/external-reference-table.h:10:
In file included from ../deps/v8/src/builtins/accessors.h:10:
In file included from ../deps/v8/src/objects/property-details.h:12:
../deps/v8/src/utils/utils.h:333:29: error: integer value 31 is outside the valid range of values [0, 15] for the enumeration type 'Kind' [-Wenum-constexpr-conversion]
333 | static constexpr T kMax = static_cast<T>(kNumValues - 1);
| ^
2 warnings and 1 error generated.
Also include the following system information:
Package manager version: 0.45.99.git
Distribution version: selfupdate-git Sat Dec 6 12:50:53 2025, 15.0, arm64
Trees: local/main stable/main
Xcode.app: 26.1.1
Xcode command-line tools: 26.1.0.0.1.1761104275
nodejs-12.22.5-2 is set to build with only one job.
|
|
From: Scott H. <sha...@us...> - 2025-12-07 00:59:55
|
Fink stalls on installing nodejs because it can’t find the source either the master copy or the fink copy. Fortunately I have a copy of the source on my second machine and copied it from there. But a new copy needs to be in the source distributions. The file seems to be a Debian only copy? nodejs_12.22.5\~dfsg-2\~11u1.debian.tar.xz Yes, I know the current version is 25.2.1 but I am on travel starting tomorrow and the Debian only source means there are tricks to the install or interactions I am not ready to deal with at the moment. -sth |
|
From: Hanspeter N. <fi...@sn...> - 2025-12-05 13:27:32
|
On 11/29/25 4:39 PM, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
> Running on an Intel Mac. Everything updated. Trying to do a clean
> install (deleted /opt/sw). Everything has been .po problems since I
> upgraded to Tahoe.
>
> ...
>
> /bin/cp -f /Users/htodd2/git/fink/update/config.guess build-aux
> /bin/cp -f /Users/htodd2/git/fink/update/config.sub build-aux
> [ -r /opt/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/finkinfo/base/dpkg.patch ]
> sed -e 's,@FINKPREFIX@,/opt/sw/bootstrap,g' -e
> 's,@ARCHITECTURE@,x86_64,g'
> /opt/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/finkinfo/base/dpkg.patch | patch -p1
> patching file 'fink/buildflags.conf'
> patching file 'fink/dpkg.cron.daily'
> patching file 'fink/md5sum'
> patching file 'fink/origins'
> patching file 'fink/patches/add-BOD.patch'
> patching file 'fink/patches/build-fix.patch'
> patching file 'fink/patches/c++filt-defaults.patch'
> patching file 'fink/patches/coreutils.patch'
> patching file 'fink/patches/extra-env.patch'
...
> patching file 'lib/dpkg/pkg-show.c'
> patching file 'lib/dpkg/pkg.c'
> patching file 'm4/dpkg-build.m4'
> patching file 'src/archives.c'
> patching file 'src/depcon.c'
> patching file 'src/enquiry.c'
> patching file 'src/help.c'
> patching file 'src/packages.c'
> patching file 'src/t/dpkg_divert.t'
> patching file 'src/trigproc.c'
> patch -p1 < fink/patches/coreutils.patch
> patching file 'scripts/dpkg-maintscript-helper.sh'
> patch -p1 < fink/patches/fink-bld_no_fakeroot.patch
> patching file 'scripts/dpkg-buildpackage.pl'
> perl -pi -e 's,in po4a,in notpo4a,g' configure
> perl -pi -e 's,^(\#\!\s?/usr/bin/perl.*)$,$1\nBEGIN \{ push\(\@INC\,
> \"\/opt/sw/bootstrap\/lib\/perl5\"\) \}\;,'
> /opt/sw/src/fink.build/dpkg-bootstrap-1.19.7-1/dpkg-1.19.7/scripts/*.pl
> for i in
> /opt/sw/src/fink.build/dpkg-bootstrap-1.19.7-1/dpkg-1.19.7/po/*.po
> /opt/sw/src/fink.build/dpkg-bootstrap-1.19.7-1/dpkg-1.19.7/po/*.pot
> /opt/sw/src/fink.build/dpkg-bootstrap-1.19.7-1/dpkg-1.19.7/doc/triggers.txt /opt/sw/src/fink.build/dpkg-bootstrap-1.19.7-1/dpkg-1.19.7/man/*.man /opt/sw/src/fink.build/dpkg-bootstrap-1.19.7-1/dpkg-1.19.7/man/*/*.man; do perl -pi -e 's,/usr,/opt/sw/bootstrap,g' $i; perl -pi -e 's,/var,/opt/sw/bootstrap/var,g' $i; perl -pi -e 's,/etc,/opt/sw/bootstrap/etc,g' $i; perl -pi -e 's,amd64,x86_64,g' $i; done cp scripts/t/Dpkg_Shlibs/objdump.basictags-amd64 scripts/t/Dpkg_Shlibs/objdump.basictags-x86_64
> perl -pi -e 's,amd64,x86_64,g' data/*table scripts/Makefile.in
...
> checking whether NLS is requested... yes
> checking for msgfmt... no
> checking for gmsgfmt... :
> checking for xgettext... no
> checking for msgmerge... no
> checking build system type... x86_64-apple-darwin
...
> Making all in po
> test ! -f ./dpkg.pot || \
> test -z "ast.gmo bs.gmo ca.gmo cs.gmo da.gmo de.gmo dz.gmo el.gmo
> eo.gmo es.gmo et.gmo eu.gmo fr.gmo gl.gmo hu.gmo id.gmo it.gmo ja.gmo
> km.gmo ko.gmo ku.gmo lt.gmo mr.gmo nb.gmo ne.gmo nl.gmo nn.gmo pa.gmo
> pl.gmo pt.gmo pt_BR.gmo ro.gmo ru.gmo sk.gmo sv.gmo th.gmo tl.gmo
> tr.gmo vi.gmo zh_CN.gmo zh_TW.gmo" ||
> /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin/make ast.gmo
> bs.gmo ca.gmo cs.gmo da.gmo de.gmo dz.gmo el.gmo eo.gmo es.gmo et.gmo
> eu.gmo fr.gmo gl.gmo hu.gmo id.gmo it.gmo ja.gmo km.gmo ko.gmo ku.gmo
> lt.gmo mr.gmo nb.gmo ne.gmo nl.gmo nn.gmo pa.gmo pl.gmo pt.gmo
> pt_BR.gmo ro.gmo ru.gmo sk.gmo sv.gmo th.gmo tl.gmo tr.gmo vi.gmo
> zh_CN.gmo zh_TW.gmo
> : --update --previous --add-location=file --quiet --lang=bs bs.po dpkg.pot
> : --update --previous --add-location=file --quiet --lang=ast ast.po dpkg.pot
> : --update --previous --add-location=file --quiet --lang=ca ca.po dpkg.pot
> : --update --previous --add-location=file --quiet --lang=de de.po dpkg.pot
> : --update --previous --add-location=file --quiet --lang=cs cs.po dpkg.pot
> : --update --previous --add-location=file --quiet --lang=da da.po dpkg.pot
> : --update --previous --add-location=file --quiet --lang=dz dz.po dpkg.pot
> : --update --previous --add-location=file --quiet --lang=eo eo.po dpkg.pot
> : --update --previous --add-location=file --quiet --lang=el el.po dpkg.pot
> /bin/sh: msgmerge: command not found
...
> make[3]: *** [hu.gmo] Error 1
> make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make[3]: *** [gl.gmo] Error 1
> mv: rename t-id.gmo to id.gmo: No such file or directory
> make[3]: *** [id.gmo] Error 1
> rm -f it.gmo && : -c --statistics --verbose -o it.gmo it.po
> rm -f ja.gmo && : -c --statistics --verbose -o ja.gmo ja.po
> rm -f ko.gmo && : -c --statistics --verbose -o ko.gmo ko.po
> rm -f km.gmo && : -c --statistics --verbose -o km.gmo km.po
> rm -f ku.gmo && : -c --statistics --verbose -o ku.gmo ku.po
> rm -f mr.gmo && : -c --statistics --verbose -o mr.gmo mr.po
> rm -f lt.gmo && : -c --statistics --verbose -o lt.gmo lt.po
> rm -f nb.gmo && : -c --statistics --verbose -o nb.gmo nb.po
> rm -f ne.gmo && : -c --statistics --verbose -o ne.gmo ne.po
> rm -f nl.gmo && : -c --statistics --verbose -o nl.gmo nl.po
> rm -f nn.gmo && : -c --statistics --verbose -o nn.gmo nn.po
> mv: rename t-ko.gmo to ko.gmo: No such file or directory
> mv: rename t-km.gmo to km.gmo: No such file or directory
> mv: rename t-ja.gmo to ja.gmo: No such file or directory
> Also include the following system information:
> Package manager version: 0.45.99.git
> Distribution version: selfupdate-point (bootstrap), 26.0, x86_64
> Trees: local/main stable/main
> Xcode.app: 26.1.1
> Xcode command-line tools: 26.1.0.0.1.1761104275
> Max. Fink build jobs: 16
The fatal error during the dpkg-bootstrap build is .gmo files not being
present, which is caused by a lack of msgmerge. ./configure checks for
it and reports 'no', so why is it using it? Also, msgmerge comes from
gettext-tools, which dpkg-bootstrap should not need.
On my test system, where it says 'making all in po', I just get
"Nothing to be done for `all'." and goes to the next directory.
So something is happening that's telling your system to go into that
directory when it should be skipped...
Hanspeter
--
If you woke up from your sleep blood on your hands
+-----------------------------+ Would you wash away the pain
| Hanspeter Niederstrasser | No one understands
| | There must be someone out there who
+-----------------------------+ Can help you breathe again
And would it ever be enough
|
|
From: Scott H. <sha...@us...> - 2025-12-04 19:35:05
|
The build type is not detected correctly. Issue submitted: https://github.com/fink/fink-distributions/issues/1289 -Scott |
|
From: Franchetti, G. Dr. <G.F...@gs...> - 2025-12-04 03:17:46
|
Hello,
Following the warning of the compilation process, I have moved away *gmp* from /usr/local/lib
Now, trying to compile gcc12, the previous warning disappears.
However, a new error appears. See below
Giuliano
../../gcc-12.2.0/gcc/hash-map.h:39:19: note: previous use is here
39 | class GTY((user)) hash_map
| ^
./gt-cp-pt.h:210:61: note: did you mean class here?
210 | struct hash_map<tree,tree_pair_p> * x ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED = (struct hash_map<tree,tree_pair_p> *)x_p;
| ^~~~~~
| class
11 warnings generated.
7 warnings generated.
rm gcc.pod
make[2]: *** [all-stage1-gcc] Error 2
make[1]: *** [stage1-bubble] Error 2
make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
### execution of /tmp/fink.OxmD5 failed, exit code 2
### execution of /tmp/fink.ME0k4 failed, exit code 2
Removing runtime build-lock...
Removing build-lock package...
/opt/sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-gcc12-12.2.0-3
(Reading database ... 269020 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing fink-buildlock-gcc12-12.2.0-3 (2025.12.04-04.07.35) ...
Failed: phase compiling: gcc12-12.2.0-3 failed
Before reporting any errors, please run "fink selfupdate" and try again.
Also try using "fink configure" to set your maximum build jobs to 1 and
attempt to build the package again.
If you continue to have issues, please check to see if the FAQ on Fink's
website solves the problem. If not, ask on one (not both, please) of
these mailing lists:
The Fink Users List <fin...@li...>
The Fink Beginners List <fin...@li...>.
Please try to include the complete error message in your report. This
generally consists of a compiler line starting with e.g. "gcc" or "g++"
followed by the actual error output from the compiler.
Also include the following system information:
Package manager version: 0.45.99.git
Distribution version: selfupdate-git Thu Dec 4 04:07:08 2025, 14.4, x86_64
Trees: local/main stable/main local/injected
Xcode.app: 16.2
Xcode command-line tools: 16.2.0.0.1.1733547573
Max. Fink build jobs: 12
|
|
From: Franchetti, G. Dr. <G.F...@gs...> - 2025-12-02 06:25:27
|
Hello,
gcc11 does not compile as well.
Giuliano
.
.
.
.
patching file 'gcc/c-family/c-pch.c'
patching file 'gcc/c/c-decl.c'
patching file 'gcc/c/c-tree.h'
patching file 'gcc/c/c-typeck.c'
patching file 'gcc/calls.c'
patching file 'gcc/calls.h'
patching file 'gcc/common.opt'
patching file 'gcc/config.gcc'
patching file 'gcc/config.host'
patching file 'gcc/config.in'
patching file 'gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-builtins.c'
patching file 'gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-c.c'
patching file 'gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h'
patching file 'gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins.cc'
patching file 'gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c'
patch: **** misordered hunks! output would be garbled
### execution of /tmp/fink.mzTqQ failed, exit code 2
### execution of /tmp/fink.QG37e failed, exit code 2
Removing runtime build-lock...
Removing build-lock package...
/opt/sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-gcc11-11.4.0-1
(Reading database ... 269019 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing fink-buildlock-gcc11-11.4.0-1 (2025.12.02-07.22.43) ...
Failed: phase patching: gcc11-11.4.0-1 failed
Before reporting any errors, please run "fink selfupdate" and try again.
Also try using "fink configure" to set your maximum build jobs to 1 and
attempt to build the package again.
If you continue to have issues, please check to see if the FAQ on Fink's
website solves the problem. If not, ask on one (not both, please) of
these mailing lists:
The Fink Users List <fin...@li...>
The Fink Beginners List <fin...@li...>.
Please try to include the complete error message in your report. This
generally consists of a compiler line starting with e.g. "gcc" or "g++"
followed by the actual error output from the compiler.
Also include the following system information:
Package manager version: 0.45.99.git
Distribution version: selfupdate-git Tue Dec 2 07:04:24 2025, 14.4, x86_64
Trees: local/main stable/main local/injected
Xcode.app: 16.2
Xcode command-line tools: 16.2.0.0.1.1733547573
Max. Fink build jobs: 12
—
Giuliano Franchetti
Storage Rings / Accelerator Operations & Development
Phone / Telefon: +49 6159 71 1535
Fax: +49 6159 71 3099
g.f...@gs...
https://web-docs.gsi.de/~giuliano/
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH
Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany, www.gsi.de
Commercial Register / Handelsregister:
FAIR: Amtsgericht Darmstadt, HRB 89372
GSI: Amtsgericht Darmstadt, HRB 1528
Managing Directors / Geschäftsführung:
Prof. Dr. Thomas Nilsson, Dr. Katharina Stummeyer, Jörg Blaurock
Chairman of the GSI Supervisory Board / Vorsitzender des GSI-Aufsichtsrats:
Ministerialdirigent Dr. Volkmar Dietz
|
|
From: Franchetti, G. Dr. <G.F...@gs...> - 2025-12-02 06:17:25
|
Hello,
I have reinstalled fink almost completely. I miss gcc12, which fails to compile.
It gives this warning
-----WARNING-----WARNING-----WARNING-----
You seem to have GMP installed in /usr/local.
This is known to cause gcc12 to fail to build.
Please move aside /usr/local and try again.
-----WARNING-----WARNING-----WARNING-----
Do I really have to do that?
This never happened in earlier compilations.
Giuliano
.
.
.
find . -name Makefile.in | xargs perl -pi -e 's/install-info --version/false/g'
sudo -u fink-bld [ENV] sh -c /tmp/fink.gtYT_
/tmp/fink.w0BL7
#!/bin/bash -ev
set +x
if [ -e /usr/local/lib/libgmp.a ] || [ -e /usr/local/lib/libgmp.dylib ]; then
echo "-----WARNING-----WARNING-----WARNING-----"
echo "You seem to have GMP installed in /usr/local."
echo "This is known to cause gcc12 to fail to build."
echo "Please move aside /usr/local and try again."
echo "-----WARNING-----WARNING-----WARNING-----"
exit 1
else
echo "Good, /usr/local/lib/libgmp* not present."
fi
-----WARNING-----WARNING-----WARNING-----
You seem to have GMP installed in /usr/local.
This is known to cause gcc12 to fail to build.
Please move aside /usr/local and try again.
-----WARNING-----WARNING-----WARNING-----
### execution of /tmp/fink.w0BL7 failed, exit code 1
### execution of /tmp/fink.gtYT_ failed, exit code 1
Removing runtime build-lock...
Removing build-lock package...
/opt/sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-gcc12-12.2.0-3
(Reading database ... 269019 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing fink-buildlock-gcc12-12.2.0-3 (2025.12.02-07.13.01) ...
Failed: phase compiling: gcc12-12.2.0-3 failed
Before reporting any errors, please run "fink selfupdate" and try again.
Also try using "fink configure" to set your maximum build jobs to 1 and
attempt to build the package again.
If you continue to have issues, please check to see if the FAQ on Fink's
website solves the problem. If not, ask on one (not both, please) of
these mailing lists:
The Fink Users List <fin...@li...>
The Fink Beginners List <fin...@li...>.
Please try to include the complete error message in your report. This
generally consists of a compiler line starting with e.g. "gcc" or "g++"
followed by the actual error output from the compiler.
Also include the following system information:
Package manager version: 0.45.99.git
Distribution version: selfupdate-git Tue Dec 2 07:04:24 2025, 14.4, x86_64
Trees: local/main stable/main local/injected
Xcode.app: 16.2
Xcode command-line tools: 16.2.0.0.1.1733547573
Max. Fink build jobs: 12
|
|
From: Scott H. <sha...@us...> - 2025-12-02 04:51:40
|
> On Dec 1, 2025, at 22:23, Daniel E. Macks <dm...@ne...> wrote: > > Scott Hannahs via Fink-users <fin...@li... <mailto:fin...@li...>> said: >> It is the usual undefined main() issue is my guess…. >> >> I don=E2=80=99t see an implicit conversion or missing identifier. But = >> main is supposed to return an int and regfriee returns a char. Is that = >> the issue? > > There were a ton of that and similar situations. I pushed a fix. > > dan Thanks for the quick fix! -Scott |
|
From: Daniel E. M. <dm...@ne...> - 2025-12-02 03:23:37
|
Scott Hannahs via Fink-users <fin...@li...> said:
>> On Dec 1, 2025, at 17:47, fi...@sn... wrote:
>> On 2025-12-01 15:36, Franchetti, Giuliano Dr. wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> openldap24-2.4.59-3 fails to compile. See below.
>>> Giuliano
>>> .
>>> checking for regex.h... yes
>>> checking for library containing regfree... none required
>>> checking for compatible POSIX regex... no
>>> configure: error: broken POSIX regex!
>>> ### execution of ./configure failed, exit code 1
>>> ### execution of /tmp/fink.RTVlM failed, exit code 1
>>> Removing runtime build-lock...
>>> Removing build-lock package...
>>> /opt/sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-openldap24-2.4.59-3
>>> (Reading database ... 256499 files and directories currently =
> installed.)
>>> Removing fink-buildlock-openldap24-2.4.59-3 (2025.12.01-22.33.25) ...
>>> Failed: phase compiling: openldap24-2.4.59-3 failed
>
> It is the usual undefined main() issue is my guess.
>
> configure:14679: checking for compatible POSIX regex
> configure:14714: cc -o conftest -g -O2 -I/opt/sw/include/db5 =
> -DBIND_8_COMPAT -I/opt/sw/include -Wl,-dead_strip_dylibs =
> -Wl,-headerpad_max_install_names conftest.c -lkrb5 -L/opt/sw/lib =
> -ldb-5.3 >&5
> conftest.c:84:1: error: type specifier missing, defaults to 'int'; ISO =
> C99 and later do not support implicit int [-Wimplicit-int]
> 84 | main()
> | ^
> | int
> 1 error generated.
> configure:14714: $? =3D 1
> configure: program exited with status 1
> configure: failed program was:
>| /* confdefs.h */
>
> I think the relevant codes is what follows (from configure):
> char regfree ();
> int
> main ()
> {
> return regfree ();
> ;
> return 0;
> }
>
> I don=E2=80=99t see an implicit conversion or missing identifier. But =
> main is supposed to return an int and regfriee returns a char. Is that =
> the issue?
There were a ton of that and similar situations. I pushed a fix.
dan
|