|
From: Takashi S. <o-t...@sa...> - 2016-05-22 12:47:56
|
Hi, On May 22 2016 21:35, Marco Brignoli wrote: > Tnx for the detailed answer. I will go trough the 1394 TA document for > the next steps. > > Unfortunately the mixer functions are currently not reachable, as not > implemented in the BeBoB. (FunctionBlockEnhancedMixer, etc) > > One option could be to enhance the BeBoB (some form of back to the roots > for an ex assembler programmer...). I have seen some mail on this > subject you did write in the past, and I have understood the problems > related with this step. Thefore the question I have now, for an > intermediate/testing solution, is if there is any form of "passtrough", > allowing the usage of the mixer block commands even they are not > supported by the BeBoB? In libffado, the implementation of FunctionBlockEnhancedMixer is quite ugly and buggy, at least not compliant to the document of 1394TA. And it had no implementation of normal 'FunctionBlockMixer' feature. Therefore, it's better to ignore it. What do you mean the 'passthrough'? Is it the similar feature as 'direct monitoring', which routes analog/digital input to analog/digital output without PC? Regards Takashi Sakamoto |