the original source is clean and strait ... but the 0.4 source is full of "strange" ideas ... include cpps?
what is the reason for this "extreme-strange" code-splitting?
ciao dennis
btw: i've "ported" 0.4 to visualc6 and hope to get it running under linux... (maybe with qt under windows and linux)
Log in to post a comment.
the original source is clean and strait ... but the 0.4 source is full of "strange" ideas ... include cpps?
what is the reason for this "extreme-strange" code-splitting?
ciao dennis
btw: i've "ported" 0.4 to visualc6 and hope to get it running under linux... (maybe with qt under windows and linux)