I have a quick thought about the performance issue. Are those acclaimed
recordings larger than 4GB, or 2GB?
Kind regards
Andy
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Andy Xuming xuminic@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sjako,
I haven't reproduced the file size issue. It probably caused by the 32-bit
system. Could you paste the command line output of ezthumb to me please?
There are some debug information to help me to locate the performance issue.
It looks like you nailed the issues with HD recordings! I do however see
new behavior on some SD recordings, for which thumbnail generation takes
minutes (instead of seconds with v2.1.10). The behavior is as follows:
ezthumb hangs for minutes without writing anything to the console and then
decides to use the "fast" mode after which the process resumes as usual and
generates a thumbnail in seconds.
Let me see if I can find such a file. It may be large though (>1GB). I
hope this isn't a problem for you.
Another problem I noticed is that the file sizes ezthumb reports is way
off. I think on all files.
And does ezthumb use a cache? The second run on the same file
(sometimes?) seems faster.
Hi Sjako,
I have a quick thought about the performance issue. Are those acclaimed
recordings larger than 4GB, or 2GB?
Kind regards
Andy
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Andy Xuming xuminic@gmail.com wrote: