Re: [Exult-general] comments in config file

[Dancer V. <da...@us...>]

Max Horn wrote:

>>  > Sure we could do this, but the proper way would be (IMHO) to use 
>> proper XML
>> 
>>> comments, like they should be supported by *any* XML parser:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> <!-- Some comment -->
>> 
>> 
>> I agree. That would serve the principle of least astonishment.
>> Currently, the parser thinks that this is a tag named
>> "!-- Some coment --", though.
> 
> 
> That's what I expected ;)
> 
> 
>> I'm still routing for usage of expat ...
> 
> 
> Sounds sensible. Maybe somebody can do it... I actually would like to  
> do it, but I will not promise it right now, as I am quite busy these  
> days. But perhaps I can do it on sunday (or before, who knows <g>).
> 

Same here. The important thing is maintaining the wrapper that provides 
key/value access. It doesn't matter what parser/generator we use underneath.

D