Re: [XPS-devel] XPL Schema Complexity Reduction

[Reid S. <re...@re...>]

*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
Thanks, Vic. I didn't think you'd have any objections seeing as it was
your comments that sparked the decision! :)

Glad you'll be able to spend a little time on the project. I've just had
the movers here today so I'm at at the end of a bit of a dry spell. This
week I hope to get the Schema changes and start work on the compiler,
probably starting with the XVM service. Want to help?

Reid
  
On Sun, 2002-09-15 at 16:06, Victor Kirk wrote:
> *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
> At 01:31 12/09/2002 -0700, Reid Spencer wrote:
> >So, I ask you to respond to the following questions:
> >
> >         1. Does anyone feel strongly about keeping the abstract schema?
> >         2. Is anyone dead set against using English as the natural
> >            language for core XPL?
> >         3. How much demand for programming in languages that use
> >            non-English keywords would you expect?
> >         4. Do you see any fatal flaws in what I'm proposing above?
> 
> I think that this a good idea.
> 
> On another note, I hope to have a little spare time this week to
> make a start on some things.
> 
> Take care,
> 
> Vic
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> eXtProSys-devel mailing list
> eXt...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/extprosys-devel