From: Dmitriy S. <sha...@gm...> - 2013-03-27 13:47:20
|
Good. Hope, we get final agreement on that subject and will not return to it any-more ;-) On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Wolfgang Meier <wol...@ex...>wrote: > Than stable branch should be 2.0.x, next developing version 2.1.x and next >> stable 2.2.x and so on ... right? We will continue increment minor till new >> *very* cool feature will be planned or better ready for release. At that >> time 2.some-odd will be released as 3.0.x. >> > > That's correct. 2.0.x is the current stable branch, which should be > followed (please!) by a few development releases in the 2.1.x series. 2.2.x > will be the next stable branch to replace 2.0. There used to be a document > about our release policy, but I'm not sure where it did go in the new > documentation. > -- Dmitriy Shabanov |