Re: [Exist-open] Documentation push for eXist 2.0 release

[Joe W. <jo...@gm...>]

Hi Leif-Jöran,

> Joe, it is great to have the table at the top. Please note that many of
> the articles with change dates after March 2012 (to September 2012) were
> partially or fully reviewed, as is, in the merge process this summer
> leading to the 2.0 review process. So articles with older than that
> dates are in greater review need than those marked April to September 2012.

That's great to know, thank you.  I'll keep that in mind.  Also, if
there are articles listed on the spreadsheet that you think no longer
need review (i.e. are fully up to date for a 2.0 release), then by all
means, feel free to change their status to Reviewed (the Status column
is a drop down menu, so choose #3: Reviewed).  That will automatically
update the table at the top of the spreadsheet, and it'll help
everyone know that the article is ready to go for the 2.0 release.

Joe