|
From: Joshua W. <jos...@gm...> - 2010-07-09 07:13:06
|
Hello, 2010/7/9 Dannes Wessels <da...@ex...>: > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Joshua Willems > <jos...@gm...> wrote: >> I guess I'll just make another thread for that issue, maybe it can be >> solved somehow. > > I think I provided the solution in the mail I'm sorry, could you point me to where you provided the solution for the validator ignoring the mode="no" setting? >>> http://xml.apache.org/commons/components/resolver/resolver-article.html >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XML_Catalog > >> I'm sorry, but I'm really not good with DTDs. Could you show what the >> DTD would look like? > > The way how to do this is in the links (e.g.. the first one). Please > read some more in detail : > http://xml.apache.org/commons/components/resolver/resolver-article.html#s.whats.wrong I've read that page, but I still don't really know what I should do. Should I assign a public identifier to the DOCTYPE? And to all those individual language files? Because that doesn't sound very useful to me: the files are known to reside in the same directory as the l10n.xml file; there can be no confusion as to where they're located. If it weren't for eXist trying to validate it on upload, there'd be no problem. Anyway, I tried the following catalog entry earlier: <system systemId="l10n.dtd" uri="/db/apps/context/stylesheets/common/l10n.dtd"/> But that didn't work. -Joshua |