From: Dmitriy S. <sha...@gm...> - 2010-04-13 08:09:46
|
Note: it wasn't changed. It's in plan. On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Dannes Wessels <da...@ex...>wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:51 AM, Dmitriy Shabanov <sha...@gm...> > wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 19:58 +0000, di...@us... wrote: > >> Collection root = DatabaseManager.getCollection("xmldb:exist://" + > >> DBBroker.ROOT_COLLECTION, "admin", null); > > > > You should not use null as password, use "". On null password account > > will be blocked (for now it have workaround at password check time, but > > I do want to change it after next release). > > Aha. Is this what we want? What is the rationale? Probably there is > lot's of code relying on the NULL since that is what we use ourself in > our test code and samples code. > Any changes in this area could be a bit dangerous...... should be > communicated very well. Since I was not aware of it -yet-, > communication on this change is still required...... > > (e.g. update of javadoc) > > cheers > > Dannes > > > > -- > eXist-db Native XML Database - http://exist-db.org > Join us on linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=35624 > -- Dmitriy Shabanov |