|
From: Vyacheslav S. <vya...@gm...> - 2010-01-05 14:09:17
|
i did not see reasons to hide exist - even more i can suggest in some cases to use eXist as proxy server for some reasons 2010/1/5 Joe Wicentowski <jo...@gm...>: > Claudius, > >>> This means that on a production server one can use only eXist, without >>> apache in front of it, as is suggested in eXist's documentation? > > Yes, one can - remember to take the usual security precautions > outlined in http://exist-db.org/production_good_practice.html. > >> On web facing production server I would recommend using Apache HTTP or >> Nginx upfront and reverse proxy eXist into the URI namespace. See the >> production best practice bits in the documentation... > > Adam - in http://exist-db.org/production_web_proxying.html you > explained the reasons behind the 'positive' reasons for adopting the > reverse proxy approach (1. Unified web namespace and 2. Virtual > Hosting), but could you expand a bit on the 'negative' reason: "eXist > like any Web Application Server (Tomcat, WebLogic, GlassFish, etc) > should not be directly exposed to the Web." My understanding was that > Jetty played the role of 'web server' to eXist's 'web application > server', no? Pardon my ignorance! > > Joe > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community > Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support > A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy > Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers > http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Exist-open mailing list > Exi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-open > |