From: Pierrick B. <pie...@cu...> - 2006-11-06 13:34:29
|
Hi, Stefan Kreutter a =E9crit : > The problem I had is related to an API change which is IMHO =20 > significant due to the fact that we have a minor release 1.x -> 1.x.1 I'm afraid eXist developers don't have that level of control over the=20 code :-) > It is mentioned somewhere in the ChangeLog but I think one has to =20 > point out the consequences more explicit. It would have been more explicit in the announce if the developers had=20 to discuss about this point before releasing the new version. Generally,=20 a discussion occurs when a test case demonstrates a regression or raises=20 a design problem. As far as I remember, we've had no discussion about=20 this particular point. Feel free to provide one or more test case if you want a "constant"=20 behaviour in eXist and thus in your applications. <snip/> Cheers, --=20 Pierrick Brihaye, informaticien Service r=E9gional de l'Inventaire / DRAC Bretagne mailto:pie...@cu... / t=E9l : +33 (0)2 99 29 67 78 Avez-vous lu http://usenet-fr.news.eu.org/fr-chartes/rfc1855.html ? |