From: Boris V. <int...@gm...> - 2006-07-30 13:12:59
|
Hoy ! > And now 3919 : http://news.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.exist.cvs wow, you never stop ! ;-) > In other terms, no index ;-) However, don't make things over-complicated > by restricting the original indexed node set (//commande/statut if I > remember well). Let's make vary as few parameters as possible. results are the same without that selection (@id = "co0"). I wanted just a node to be sure. > > a very impressive gain in response times. > > You definitely should expect the same magntude with a successful use of > range-indexes. yes, i know, that's the problem ;-) > So, update your SVN regularly ;-) ok ;-) i have the 3019 now (the svn ML with gmane doesn't work for me today) i have build/reindex and re-executed my query //commande[statut=1] on my collections and i have the same performances and the same profiler log (always no line with "value index", always "fallback ... (no index found)". > > in fact, all my datas are generated by a python script > > i can post my script and my xconf if you want > > I'd really prefer an "off the scratch" solution ;-) what do you mean by "off the scratch" solution ? is there an other test that i can execute to help to identify the problem ? Boris |