Re: [Exist-open] util:qname function - PROBLEM RESOLVED

[Pierrick B. <pie...@fr...>]

Michael Beddow wrote:

> Making such a change is without prior consultation is bad. Making it without
> very plain notification and fully amended documentation is even worse. This
> is not the way to enhance eXist's reputation and take-up, and not the way to
> do community-based development.

Errr... bad night Michael ?

 From my point of view, the way to do community-based development is to 
provide non-regression tests where we can easily and immediately detect 
that a change in the code breaks functionalities, particularly agreed 
and eventually well documented ones.

However, as said before, I will review the code around the embededd 
configuration files... As usual, code will be commited after the full 
test suite succeeds.

Back to work.

Cheers,

p.b.