|
From: Kevin C. <kev...@us...> - 2003-06-02 14:21:12
|
On Monday 02 June 2003 08:53, Don Mulvey wrote: > >Right clicking the "ld-missing_child_1" does not present a "Replace..." > >option. > > I think you realize at this point that ld-missing_child_1 is not an area on > any disk in your system. It is simply a place holder that provides a DM > error mapping ... so that the drivelink can be constructed and recoverd by > restoring the missing object or by shrinking the drivelink. It makes no > sense for you to replace the missing object ... it means that your going to > find an available object and then copy the contents of ld-missing_child_1 > to the object ... only the i/o is going to fail during the copy because > there is not storage backing the missing child. But...it would still be nice to have some option (be it replace or some DriveLinking private-function) to stick in a clean child where the missing child used to be. Obviously this operation would have to skip the "copy" portion of the replace. For example, in the LVM plugin, if a PV is missing, you can do a "Move-PE" to change the mapping of the affected LE to some other available PE in the container. The "Move-PE" command simply skips the copy if the source PE is missing. This allows the user to get their volume back to a functional state, even if the data within the volume might be trashed. -- Kevin Corry kev...@us... http://evms.sourceforge.net/ |