From: Jean-Marc V. <jea...@gm...> - 2009-09-28 16:25:50
|
Hi all Now both ReDeFer and Gloze are integrated in EulerGUI (in Subversion), so it's more simple to compare. The output is quite similar in both. I corrected <xsd:all> in ReDeFer. I did nothing in Gloze, except a bit of defensive programming in two Jena classes. The problems I'm aware of are: - purchase order po.xsd from XML Schema primer does not pass with ReDeFer - XSD enumerations ( test case XForms XSD ) ; it is not translated at all in ReDeFer , and translated wrongly in Gloze like this: xforms_:appearanceType a owl:Class ; owl:unionOf ([ a owl:DataRange ; owl:oneOf ( "full"^^xsd:string "compact"^^xsd:string "minimal"^^xsd:string ) ]) . when it should be: xforms_:appearanceType a owl:Class ; owl:equivalentClass [ a owl:Class ; owl:oneOf ( xforms_:OWLIndividual_full xforms_:OWLIndividual_compact xforms_:OWLIndividual_minimal ) ] . xforms_:OWLIndividual_full a owl:Thing ; rdfs:label "full" . xforms_:OWLIndividual_compact a owl:Thing ; rdfs:label "compact" . xforms_:OWLIndividual_minimal a owl:Thing ; rdfs:label "minimal" . Kind Regards -- Jean-Marc Vanel Consulting, services, training, Rule-based programming, Semantic Web http://jmvanel.free.fr/ +33 (0)6 89 16 29 52 -- +33 (0)1 39 55 58 16 ( we rarely listen to voice messages, please send a mail instead ) |