|
From: <ke...@et...> - 2003-07-25 23:56:31
|
>methods are setting up a RIS server (ugly) or somehow try to get the RIS >boot disk tagged for etherboot (ugly, especially considering the likely >lack of support for my NIC, the sis900). =20 Have you looked? There is a sis900 driver. >Is this too far outside to purview of the etherboot project to be done?=20 >Etherboot would then have to maintain some process in memory to be able >to communicate with the iscsi server while the machine was running. Etherboot gets displaced by whatever it's loading so it cannot "maintain some process in memory". I don't know how feasible it is to boot off iscsi. It may require a more complex network stack, i.e. TCP, than Etherboot has. |
