From: Mario L. <ml...@de...> - 2005-08-11 13:08:24
|
Jorgen Schaefer <fo...@fo...> writes: > Michael Olson <mw...@gn...> writes: > >> The manual would probably need to be licensed under the GFDL, >> though I haven't asked Richard about that particular point yet. > > FWIW: Quite recently, I had a similar question for the copyright > clerk, and he told me that the FDL is the only suitable license > for documentation that is contributed to Emacs. I'd like to remind people about the problems this generates in regards to the DFSG. Is there any resolution of the GFDL/DFSG license issues on the horizon? -- CYa, Mario |