|
From: Adrian A. <ad...@xe...> - 2004-05-29 23:26:49
|
Adrian Aichner <ad...@xe...> writes: <14 lines deleted by Adrian Aichner> >> be pulled in as the log entry. Had you read HACKING of course, >> you would know this already :). > > I read it and I was referring to this bit: > > > If you do use these helpers and then cut and paste into > the *cvs-commit* buffer, please remove the leading header line and > the leading spaces and module names, since they get reconstructed > automatically. > > e.g. > M-x add-change-log-entry RET might give something like this: > > | 2004-03-04 Lawrence Mitchell <we...@gm...> > | > | * erc.el (erc-foo-p): New function. > > We only want the following in the cvs log: > > | (erc-foo-p): New function. > > Hmmh, I failed to register the bit about C-c C-a, gonna try that, thanks! Hey, that works, after I adjust the CahngeLog entry date. That could craete a tracability problem though, since ChangeLog date entries have to be edited at commit time, which is often not on the same day as the patch submission. At any rate, I'm a happy camper now! > >> >> OTOH, I think this is yet another plea for, "can we have a >> proper changelog please", what do people think? > > No, I can comply with any process, as long as it's automated for > XEmacs as well as GNU Emacs. OK, one concern less, it does work in XEmacs :-) <40 lines deleted by Adrian Aichner> -- Adrian Aichner mailto:ad...@xe... http://www.xemacs.org/ |