|
From: Lawrence M. <we...@gm...> - 2004-05-29 22:22:06
|
Adrian Aichner wrote: [...] > ChangeLog is for review purposes and will be massaged into shape for > commit. > This gotta be automated. Use the normal Emacs changelog editing stuff, i.e. C-x 4 a, etc... Then, when you come to commit stuff, in the *cvs-commit* buffer, do C-c C-a, and, automagically, the changelog entry will be pulled in as the log entry. Had you read HACKING of course, you would know this already :). OTOH, I think this is yet another plea for, "can we have a proper changelog please", what do people think? [...] > * erc-autojoin.el: Typo fix. > * erc-dcc.el (erc-dcc-do-GET-command): Use expand-file-name. > * erc-dcc.el (erc-dcc-get-file): Ditto. > * erc-log.el (erc-generate-log-file-name-with-date): XEmacs > set-buffer-multibyte compatibility. > * erc-log.el (erc-generate-log-file-name-short): Use expand-file-name. > * erc-log.el (erc-save-buffer-in-logs): Wrap `with-current-buffer' > in `save-excursion' as suggested by Sebastian Freundt. > * erc-members.el: XEmacs set-buffer-multibyte compatibility. > * erc-sound.el: Use expand-file-name. > * erc.el (erc-debug-log-file): Ditto. > * erc.el (erc-find-file): Ditto. Some of this changelog entry looks wrong. For instance, you don't put any set-buffer-multibyte stuff in erc-log, it's in erc-dcc. And erc-members only gets an (eval-when-compile (require 'erc)). Other than that, I see nothing wrong with the actual patches themselves. [...] -- Lawrence Mitchell <we...@gm...> |