[E-devel] Re: E CVS: e term

[<ra...@ra...>]

On 22 Apr, enl...@li... scribbled:
>  Enlightenment CVS committal
>  
>  Author  : term
>  Project : web
>  Module  : e
>  
>  Dir     : web/e/pages/img
>  
>  
>  Added Files:
>  	background.gif e-logo-topleft.gif e-title.gif nav_download.gif 
>  	nav_goodies.gif nav_info.gif nav_mail.gif nav_main.gif 
>  	nav_news.gif nav_shots.gif nav_source.gif nav_team.gif 
>  	shadow_l.gif 
>  
>  
>  Log Message:
>  Okay, I've done some cleaning up. I took out all of the png files I saw, and
>  made some other changes.
>   
>  I *have* tested this in at least Netscape 4.7x (Windows),
>  MSIE 5.x (Windows), Konquerer 2.1.1, Netscape 4.76 (Linux), and Mozilla (from
>  this past week). All produced no errors not caused by Netscape refusing to
>  properly display tables (but I'm open to suggestions on how to fix that; to
>  see what the problem is, see the info page).
>   
>  I haven't made many changes to the stuff raster wrote for the most part, so
>  if you find problems elsewhere, please let me know. I do know that Konquerer
>  (the one I got from debian sid) didn't like the evas code in his evas
>  tutorial -- suggestions? <pre> tags? I donno.
>   
>  I hope this solves the problems people were having. Let me know how it does in
>  w3 validation, I'm way too tired to run it through now, and I'm not correcting
>  problems if they're not with the overall style template (there's going to be so
>  many in the individual pages..). 2.1.1, Netscape 4.76 (Linux), and Mozilla
>  (from this past week). All produced no errors not caused by Netscape refusing
>  to properly display tables (but I'm open to suggestions on how to fix that; to
>  see what the problem is, see the info page).
>   
>  I haven't made many changes to the stuff raster wrote for the most part, so
>  if you find problems elsewhere, please let me know. I do know that Konquerer
>  (the one I got from debian sid) didn't like the evas code in his evas
>  tutorial -- suggestions? <pre> tags? I donno.
>   
>  I hope this solves the problems people were having. Let me know how it does
>  in w3 validation, I'm way too tired to run it through now, and I'm not
>  correcting problems if they're not with the overall style template (there's
>  going to be so many in the individual pages..).

and now the page loogs like shit :)seriously. the "logo" images werent
designed to be on their own - their were intende3d to be in their
tables with borders. the tables dont format consistantly betwen page
s(the nav bar on the left keeps chanign size - i managed to et this
down pat so tabels actually format the same bwteen ie, netscape and
mozilla - and well you did break that now). you honestly woudl have
been just better chanigng the paragraph macro and chanigng pngs->gifs
because now it does look like shit. (compare the page between netcsape
and mozilla) also the evas log has a white (welllight gray) becuase it
was designed for the original background. in netscape. mozilla will
blend. netscape blends to the png's background color. of course in
mozilla it blends badly with the bg of the evas logo being a different
colr  to the rest of the page (this is a mozilla/netscape 6 rendering
bug) errr.. you need to fix the png's so their background colro is th
esame as the page - either that or go and turn it all into gif's and
uuse just plain on/off transparency and stick to a fixed backgroudn
colro that u can basically never change without redrawing ALL of the
images on the pages.

rememebr the page as it was before at leats formated the same and
looked similkar enuf in browsers - now it starts looking completely
different.

-- 
--------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    ra...@ra...     ra...@va...
VA Linux Systems                    ra...@de...
Mobile Phone: +1 408 887 3163	    Work Phone: +1 510 687 7069