Menu
▾
▴
Re: [e-users] Problem compiling `python-efl` on `Ubuntu PPA`.
|
From: Martinx - ジ. <thi...@gm...> - 2014-11-14 03:01:31
|
Guys! I'm seeing that this isn't a problem of `python-efl` itself but, I appreciate any help to fix this! :-P Python-efl is failing to build on a clean `utopic` `pbuilder` environment (plus this PPA `ppa:martinx/enlightenment`), while `libef`, `elementary` and `enlightenment`, evas, emotion, etc, are all being packaged okay within this very same "pbuilder environment", except `python-efl`. It detected `Ethumb 1.12.0` but refuses to use it! Check it out: Output of `pbuilder-dist utopic build python-efl_1.11.0-0utopic3.dsc`: -- ... Checking for EcoreX: OK, found 1.12.0 Checking for Ethumb: Ethumb version mismatch. Found: 1.12.0 Needed: 1.11.0 E: pybuild pybuild:256: build: plugin distutils failed with: exit code=1: /usr/bin/python setup.py build ... -- But, if I try to package it [python-efl] outside of the `pbuilder`, using `dpkg-buildpackage`, then, it works! I'm using it (my `python-efl` deb package) locally on my Desktop... When it works, the output is like this: Output of `dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -uc -us`: -- ...... debian/rules build dh build --with python2 --buildsystem=python_distutils dh_testdir -O--buildsystem=python_distutils dh_auto_configure -O--buildsystem=python_distutils dh_auto_build -O--buildsystem=python_distutils Checking for Eina: OK, found 1.12.0 Checking for Eo: OK, found 1.12.0 Checking for Evas: OK, found 1.12.0 Checking for Ecore: OK, found 1.12.0 Checking for EcoreFile: OK, found 1.12.0 Checking for EcoreInput: OK, found 1.12.0 Checking for EcoreX: OK, found 1.12.0 Checking for Ethumb: OK, found 1.12.0 Checking for Ethumb_Client: OK, found 1.12.0 Checking for Edje: OK, found 1.12.0 Checking for Emotion: OK, found 1.12.0 Checking for DBus: OK, found 1.2.0 Checking for Elementary: OK, found 1.12.0 running build running build_py ..... dpkg-deb: building package `python-efl' in `../python-efl_1.11.0-0utopic1_amd64.deb'. -- Yay! Ethumb `1.12.0` was detected and used as expected! I don't understand why `python-efl` detects the very same `Ethumb 1.12.0` within the "pbuilder environment" but, it refuses to use it there! But, why?! Python-efl said it "Found: 1.12.0" but "Needs: 1.11.0"... wtf? :-/ I don't know if this is a fault of `python-efl` (probably not) or a fault of the "pbuilder environment"... So, I really appreciate any help! If you guys don't mind... :-) I'm using E19 on a daily basis on Ubuntu (Debian on tests), so, I'll maintain this packages for a life... ^_^ "E19 PPA Page": https://launchpad.net/~martinx/+archive/ubuntu/enlightenment Cheers! Thiago On 13 November 2014 20:52, Martinx - ジェームズ <thi...@gm...> wrote: > Cool! That first error disappeared after adding: > > -- > * Adding "X-Python-Version" to debian/control > -- > > But, the `python-efl` problem is still there... Look: > > https://launchpadlibrarian.net/190315665/buildlog_ubuntu-utopic-amd64.python-efl_1.11.0-0utopic2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz > > Apparently, something is wrong with `python-efl` itself, since the > error message come from it, am I right?! > > Nevertheless, `python-efl` compiles in my machine, so, nothing is > wrong with it... weird... > > I'll try to ask this @ launchpad-users instead... > > Cheers! > > On 13 November 2014 18:25, Christopher Barry > <chr...@gm...> wrote: >> On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 18:14:13 -0200 >> Martinx - ジェームズ <thi...@gm...> wrote: >> >>>Just fro the record, here is `python-efl` package compiling (snipped) >>>on my machine: >>> >>>--- >>>user@ubunut-desk-1:~/e19/python-efl/python-efl-1.11.0$ make -f >>>debian/rules build >>>dh build --with python2 --buildsystem=python_distutils >>> dh_testdir -O--buildsystem=python_distutils >>> dh_auto_configure -O--buildsystem=python_distutils >>> dh_auto_build -O--buildsystem=python_distutils >>>pyversions: missing X(S)-Python-Version in control file, fall back to >>>debian/pyversions >>>pyversions: missing debian/pyversions file, fall back to supported >>>versions Checking for Eina: OK, found 1.12.0 >>>Checking for Eo: OK, found 1.12.0 >>>Checking for Evas: OK, found 1.12.0 >>>Checking for Ecore: OK, found 1.12.0 >>>Checking for EcoreFile: OK, found 1.12.0 >>>Checking for EcoreInput: OK, found 1.12.0 >>>Checking for EcoreX: OK, found 1.12.0 >>>Checking for Ethumb: OK, found 1.12.0 >>>Checking for Ethumb_Client: OK, found 1.12.0 >>>Checking for Edje: OK, found 1.12.0 >>>Checking for Emotion: OK, found 1.12.0 >>>Checking for DBus: OK, found 1.2.0 >>>Checking for Elementary: OK, found 1.12.0 >>>--- >>> >>>I don't undersatdn why it doens't compiles on Launchpad... :-( >>> >>>I really appreciate any help! >>> >>>Thanks! >>>Thiago >>> >>>On 13 November 2014 18:05, Martinx - ジェームズ >>><thi...@gm...> wrote: >>>> Guys, >>>> >>>> I'm trying to compile my package of `python-elf` and, it builds okay >>>> on my machine but, at the Launchpad, it fails... >>>> >>>> Here is the log: >>>> >>>> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/190303590/buildlog_ubuntu-utopic-amd64.python-efl_1.11.0-0utopic1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz >>>> >>>> Log: >>>> >>>> --- >>>> pyversions: missing debian/pyversions file, fall back to supported >>>> versions Checking for Eina: OK, found 1.12.0 >>>> Checking for Eo: OK, found 1.12.0 >>>> Checking for Evas: OK, found 1.12.0 >>>> Checking for Ecore: OK, found 1.12.0 >>>> Checking for EcoreFile: OK, found 1.12.0 >>>> Checking for EcoreInput: OK, found 1.12.0 >>>> Checking for EcoreX: OK, found 1.12.0 >>>> Checking for Ethumb: Ethumb version mismatch. Found: 1.12.0 Needed: >>>> 1.11.0 dh_auto_build: python setup.py build --force returned exit >>>> code 1 debian/rules:7: recipe for target 'build-arch' failed >>>> make: *** [build-arch] Error 1 >>>> dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build-arch gave error exit >>>> status 2 --- >>>> >>>> Nevertheless, as I said, I have it compiled and installed on my own >>>> machine: >>>> >>>> -- >>>> python-efl_1.11.0-0utopic0_amd64.deb >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Of course, I'm using the very same Ubuntu PPA on my machine, to >>>> locally build and upload it to Launchpad... >>>> >>>> Any tips?! >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance! >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Thiago |
