Re: [e-users] Eet compared with JSON - Eet comes out on top

[Gustavo S. B. <bar...@gm...>]

On 21/08/2013, at 08:03, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <ra...@ra...> wrote:

> 
> https://phab.enlightenment.org/phame/live/1/post/eet_compared_with_json_eet_comes_out_on_top/
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Given the mainstream can't figure out what to use (XML, JSON... what's next?),
> Eet manages to lead hands-down when compared to JSON
> 
> Summary:
> 
> Data files can be between 4 and 860 TIMES larger with JSON.
> Cold read time for JSON is 10 TIMES slower than Eet.
> Cold writes take 40% longer with JSON than with Eet.
> Hot reads are 7 TIMES slower with JSON than with Eet.
> Hot writes take 37% longer with JSON than with Eet.
> 
> XML will be between 18 and 26 TIMES slower than Eet at loading config.

Great, in Tizen list (can't remember which) they were saying that qt5 json is way faster than json-c, could you try it as well? Then I can send them the links :-)



> 
> -- 
> ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
> The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    ra...@ra...
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and 
> AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights, 
> analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management. 
> Visit us today!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-users mailing list
> enl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users