Re: [E-devel] edbus.git

[Michael B. <mic...@gm...>]

On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:47:33 -0300
Lucas De Marchi <luc...@pr...> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz
> <mic...@gm...> wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:38:21 +0000
> > Daniel Willmann <d.w...@sa...> wrote:
> >
> >> On 26/03/13 15:27, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Daniel Willmann <d.w...@sa...>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> Hey,
> >> >>
> >> >> On 25/03/13 19:51, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> There wasn't any edbus release. It seems it was wrongly tagged as 1.7.
> >> >>> Please remove the tag in
> >> >>> http://git.enlightenment.org/legacy/edbus.git/
> >> >>
> >> >> That's not a tag, but a branch. As this repository is needed solely for
> >> >> the 1.7.x release (1.8 will be merged efl), we're preparing for the
> >> >> 1.7.x release and there will be no "new" development in here anyway I
> >> >> created the 1.7 branch.
> >>
> >> > A tag or a branch, it's wrong!! There has never been a release of
> >> > edbus. Only e_dbus had a release.  I'm insisting on this because edbus
> >> > is integrated on core/efl now and I don't want people coming to say we
> >> > broke the API. We didn't break simply because there wasn't any
> >> > release.
> >>
> >> Sure, and the lack of tags reflects that. I was under the impression
> >> that edbus was needed because it will be released in the next cycle of
> >> 1.7.x releases. It seems this was wrong so I'm more than happy to remove
> >> the repo completely.
> >>
> >> > Again, please remove this branch. For me it's also fine to plain
> >> > remove the repository.
> >>
> >> That is completely fine with me. Will remove then.
> >>
> >>
> >> Daniel
> >>
> >
> > removing the repo is not a good option. I don't care if you stick it in my dev space, but there needs to be an edbus repo somewhere.
> 
> 
> So at least let's make it synchronized?  I remember you fixing a bug
> that didn't exist because you were using the separate repository.  I
> am perfectly fine making the other way around... removing edbus from
> inside core/efl until it's settled for a release. Right now I want to
> add and remove functions from the API.  I think everybody would be
> happy with this approach.
> 
> 
> Daniel, hold on removing the repository.
> 
> 
> Lucas De Marchi
> 

I always tried to keep it synchronized. If I failed then it's because I didn't make copying your commits a full-time job.