Re: [E-devel] Git and Phabricator

[Michael B. <mic...@gm...>]

On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 00:58:32 +0900
Daniel Juyung Seo <seo...@gm...> wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Cedric BAIL <ced...@fr...> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Christopher Michael
> > <cp....@sa...> wrote:
> >> On 18/01/13 13:38, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> >>> On 18/01/13 13:32, Christopher Michael wrote:
> >>>> On 18/01/13 13:27, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> >>>>> On 18/01/13 11:47, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Friday, January 18, 2013, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>       On 18/01/13 11:29, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>           On Friday, January 18, 2013, Ulisses Furquim wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>               Hi Tom,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>               On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Tom Hacohen
> >>>>>>               <tom...@sa...<javascript:;>>
> >>>>>>               wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>                   Hey guys,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>                   Daniel and I have been working on migrating SVN to git
> >>>>>>                   while keeping
> >>>>>>                   complete history. We believe we got it figured out,
> >>>>>>                   we'll share the
> >>>>>>                   results on Monday.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>               How everything is going to work with git? Will we have just
> >>>>>>               one git
> >>>>>>               repository? Will people have commit access using a git
> >>>>>> shared
> >>>>>>               repository? Or will we have an integrator?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>           As I said at EFL Dev Day: if we keep cvs/svn work flow, GIT
> >>>>>>           won't help
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>       As I said at the EFL Dev DAy:
> >>>>>>       I think it will help. It's a better tool that permits people to
> >>>>>> do a
> >>>>>>       better job in producing better commits (for example local commits)
> >>>>>>       and thus better state of the repository.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>       Also, that's just a first step towards working right. I don't we
> >>>>>> can
> >>>>>>       just change everything in a bang.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> While I'll like it because of "git add -p" and local, many people
> >>>>>> already use GIT overlays and then svn-git-am.py to easily work.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The problem is if people keep their bindings "save = commit && push"
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> To tell you the truth even I just give a big fuck to doing better
> >>>>>> commits as most people don't. So others may be "inspired" as we'll and
> >>>>>> the situation degrades.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I hope it'll improve. I really do believe people will start doing things
> >>>>> right once they see the benefits. :)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Tom.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Well, it may help if you define what you consider "right" and what these
> >>>> "benefits" may be ...
> >>>
> >>> Refer to past discussions for more on that.
> >>
> >> Hmm, I do not recall seeing any past discussions about what You consider
> >> the "right" way
> >>
> >>   But either way, that's a
> >>> future subject as it's not mandatory for the switch.
> >>
> >> Oh, I agree that it is not mandatory for someone to work in the "right"
> >> way in order to do the switch...However, after the switch is done and
> >> you are expecting people to change their work flow to the "right" way
> >> then you may want to define that way ;)
> >
> > I am really concerned how I will be able to break svn if we move to
> > git. I don't see how I can do the "right" think there !
> 
> Sorry Cedric, you lost your job :(
> I hope you can still do well.
> 
> Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
> 
> 
> > --
> > Cedric BAIL
> >

ohh we'll find a way