From: Christopher M. <cpm...@co...> - 2012-11-07 22:44:21
|
David Seikel <on...@gm...> wrote: >On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 18:17:38 +0000 (UTC) cpm...@co... wrote: > >> Yes for --with-image-loaders, but No for always enable gif/tiff. >> >> Do people still use archaic formats like gif & tiff anymore ?? I >> cannot remember the last time I even Seen a tiff format image, lol :) >> These days, I believe that svg is even more common than tiff... > >Second Life and it's offspring use odd formats like TIFF and JPEG2000. >I have lots of those images here. On the other hand I want to wean >them >off those, but that would just be my EFL based fork, others would still >have to deal with those files, and I'd still have to deal with them >from others coz of that. On the gripping hand, gif and tiff should be >optional, and there's no support for jpeg2000 outside of obscure areas >anyway. > >-- >A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants >coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world. > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >LogMeIn Central: Instant, anywhere, Remote PC access and management. >Stay in control, update software, and manage PCs from one command >center >Diagnose problems and improve visibility into emerging IT issues >Automate, monitor and manage. Do more in less time with Central >http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein12331_d2d > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >enlightenment-devel mailing list >enl...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel Optional works for me ;) My main point was that in a typical desktop ( or even embedded ) situation, tiff is not something that is seen enough to be "always on by default" dh -- Sent from my Samsung phone. |