From: Vincent T. <vin...@gm...> - 2012-09-20 17:29:28
|
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Lucas De Marchi <luc...@pr...> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Leandro Pereira <le...@pr...> wrote: >> On 09/20/2012 03:28 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: >>> ah, if only we could do changelogs sanely like every other changelog in the >>> entire universe... >> >> I honestly thought Edje was stable enough that it didn't have recent >> changes -- and since ChangeLogs are traditionally written with newer >> entries on top, I just added mine there. >> >> I'll be more careful next time. I'll still mutter something about >> ChangeLogs being useless given we have commit messages (which can be as >> long as needed to explain stuff, is easier to merge, is as good a cold >> beer on a hot day, yadda yadda yadda), though. > > +1 to drop ChangeLog entirely. Here is the difference between you and me: you claim that YOU don't need a changelog because there are svn commits, so every people on earth just have to install svn or look at a slow websvn to see the changes, even those which are just "oupsie!" etc... me, who think that an average user of a lib should not need to install svn (or git or etc...) or use a slow websvn to look quickly at a changelog file. And I say that because it was in that very situation. You think only about yourself, i thnk about everyone. It takes time to write entries but i'm not lazy. I take that time, on my very limited free time. Vincent |