From: Carsten H. (T. R. <ra...@ra...> - 2012-09-18 23:16:17
|
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:57:31 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <bar...@pr...> said: > On Tuesday, September 18, 2012, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: > > > On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:35:57 -0300 > > Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <bar...@pr... <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > On Tuesday, September 18, 2012, Vincent Torri wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz > > > > <mic...@gm... <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri < > > > > > bar...@pr... <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Wait a bit and I can justify all of them. > > > > >> > > > > >> One quick is EDBus is because my editor helps me. Use emacs and be > > happy > > > > >> ;-) > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > It violates the EFL coding standard, so it must be changed > > regardless of > > > > > your own personal preferences. > > > > > > > > I agree. We do have coding standards. We *must* respect them. > > > > > > > > > In my interpretation it's following. It's E + D-Bus. So it's one of > > > E_D_Bus, E_DBus or EDBus. I choose a new version with less underscores so > > > it can coexist with the old library. > > > > > > Edbus can also be understood to break the style as D-Bus is not being > > > respected. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vincent > > > > > > > > no, because dbus is in no way the namespace here, and it is the first > > character of the namespace which receives the capitalized letter. the > > namespace > > here is edbus, so only the e is > > > > Id say there is no black and white here. But if majority wants to replace > then it's a simple sed true - this is a land of greys. imho E_* is NOT the namespace it should have no matter what - as that's e's own namepsace. :) (within app). :) Edbus_* imho is the way to go. :) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ra...@ra... |