From: Vincent T. <vin...@gm...> - 2012-05-26 08:01:16
|
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Bluezery <oh...@gm...> wrote: > 2012/5/26 Vincent Torri <vin...@gm...>: >> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Bluezery <oh...@gm...> wrote: >>> Dear EFL developers, >>> >>> Contribution page(http://web.enlightenment.org/p.php?p=contribute&l=en???) >>> have "Building" section to show how EFL source is built. But some >>> required packages seems to be missing recently. >>> Those are autopoint, libudev, xcb, xcb-shape. >>> ecore need "autopoint". eeze need "libudev" e need "xcb" and >>> "xcb-shape" (libxcb-shape0-dev) >>> I think that above packages are better to be shown in "building" section. >> >> libudev is listed (in optional packages just below) >> >> Note that autopoint comes with gettext, which is listed >> >> xcb-shape comes with xcb (if we compile xcb from sources). Btw, there >> are more X extensions than just xcb-shape which are used (in ecore, >> for ecore_x). XCB is optional, btw. > > But, without xcb, I cannot build E at all. Indeed, it's for e_alert.c. xcb and xcb-shape only. > Is this better to move from optional packages to required packages in doc? I don't know. Vincent |