Re: [E-devel] Eobj - Request for review/comments

[Tom H. <tom...@sa...>]

On 17/04/12 10:55, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> i don't see the point. it's just a pointer to something. it's fine as-is. in
> this way of doing an api we no longer can use the const attribute to say
> anything about the object here. there isn't a lot of point either.

I find it nice to have in cases where you want to query the object but 
not modify it. For example, but not only: when returning textblock 
cursors (assuming they were Eobj as well) from the textblock API...

But ok, if you think it's not needed ATM I'll just wait until I find a 
concrete use case.

Thanks for your comment.

--
Tom.