Re: [E-devel] Elm_list_go - why does it exist? + Do we really need elm_list?

[Hyoyoung C. <hyo...@gm...>]

On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Tom Hacohen <tom...@sa...> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I think I've already asked those questions before, but the release is a
> good time to review them again and make sure we like everything.
>
> First and foremost, why do we have elm_list_go, or more correctly, why
> do we only have it in elm_list and not in genlist? if it's needed, it
> should be in both, if not, it should be removed from elm_list. What is
> it's purpose?

It seems like to sacrifice convenience to get performance.
maybe we can remove elm_list_go() with some performance penalty.

>
> Second question: Do we really need elm_list? I believe that with a good
> enough default genlist item and some macros/function wrappers, we can
> just ditch elm_list and have only elm_genlist... Why does it exist?
>
> I assume it's faster than elm_genlist, but is it really *that* faster?
> Or *that* useful?

elm_list is quick and easy way to make simple list.
without genlist complex callbacks, and item classes.
IMHO, it's better to use elm_list at simple selection such as choosing
items in popup.

>
> --
> Tom.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
> monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
> resolution app monitoring today. Free.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> enl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel