From: Daniel J. S. <seo...@gm...> - 2012-01-02 03:10:48
|
Hello Tom. On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Tom Hacohen <to...@st...> wrote: > Hey all, > > Last time we talked about it, we decided not to deprecate > elm_entry_entry_get/set but leave them as clones. I didn't participate in that talk but why you decided not t deprecate them? In my opinion, deprecating elm_entry_entry_get/set before elm 1.0 sounds reasonable. My 10 cents. Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) > > The rationale was the existence of entry_append and other text > manipulation functions. > > entry_set/get were recently deprecated, was that intentional? what do > you think, do we want to deprecate them or not? > > -- > Tom. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex > infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to > virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual > desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure > costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel |