From: Mike B. <mi...@ze...> - 2011-11-08 12:12:03
|
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 10:03:11 +0100 Cedric BAIL <ced...@fr...> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 3:39 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz <mi...@ze...> wrote: > > On Sun, 6 Nov 2011 02:21:57 -0800 > > "Enlightenment SVN" <no-...@en...> wrote: > >> Log: > >> e_dbus: e_hal use some e_ukit function so we should init it. > >> > >> > >> Author: cedric > >> Date: 2011-11-06 02:21:57 -0800 (Sun, 06 Nov 2011) > >> New Revision: 64809 > >> Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/64809 > >> > >> Modified: > >> trunk/e_dbus/src/lib/hal/Makefile.am > >> trunk/e_dbus/src/lib/hal/e_hal_main.c > >> > > no. just...no. > > You could have fixed it correctly instead. Now we are using function > in hal from ukit without initilizing it. The problem are with people > that do compile with -no-undefine or disable ukit. By reverting, you > don't solve anything. no we aren't. they just have the same names. look at the files which are used to make the lib: none of them are from ukit. -- Mike Blumenkrantz Zentific: Doctor recommended, mother approved. |