From: Dennis H. <dh-...@on...> - 2011-09-05 18:03:02
|
On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 18:58:24 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <ra...@ra...> wrote: > > Only question left for the moment: How could I reduce the > > transparency of menus, without switching off the composite module? > > Depending on the background with the default setting for > > transparency the menu text is a bit hard to read, sometimes. > > Slightly less transpareny (i. e. more "opacity") would probably > > help. > > same way - change default style though. choose from the ones > available. as such all details are theme controlled so you just get > to pick the pre-made designs. This freedom in themeing comes at a cost that made me think over the last week. An E17 theme covers too many aspects to be treated as a monolithic union. I have to admit that i still don't see through! >From the edc spec I can't understand if groups have more meaning than just tagging parts of a theme. Is there a way to provide different 'versions' of definitions (e.g. for composite on/off, and simple) or to make parts of a theme excludable (e.g. anim), or is this 'degree of freedom' hardcoded dialog-wise in e itself. In this sense, how modular are compiled edj files? Best wishes, Dennis Heuer <dh-...@on...> |