Re: [E-devel] [eet] LONG_BIT not necessarly defined

[Vincent T. <vt...@un...>]

On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:

> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:53:03 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri <vt...@un...>
> said:
>
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> in eet_data, we check if LONG_BIT is not equal to 32. On some systems (at
>> least mingw when cross-compiling and mingw32ce (Windows CE)) it is not
>> defined.
>
> hmm. well sizeof() would normally be ok but i think its expanded post-cpp. so
> this may need to become some configure check to get the size of a long.
>
>> Also, I'm just wondering: shouldn't that test be done at run time ?
>
> the size of a long won't change at runtime :)

I'm evil and stupid

Vincent