From: Christopher M. <cpm...@co...> - 2008-08-03 22:40:56
|
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Sun, 03 Aug 2008 18:05:31 -0400 Christopher Michael <cpm...@co...> > babbled: > >>> Yes, you're right, I have said that and I still think it's quite true. >>> I was more thinking from a pure psychological point a view though, they >>> just don't like using CVS because to them it's old and outdated, they >>> want to use the new stuff with all it's fancy technology. Git is quite >>> a bit different and I've never had the opportunity to play with it >>> enough to make a firm judgment, so I won't say much about it's usability. >> Kind of how I hate to use Subversion ?? ;) Still tho, I don't see any >> particular SCMS being an issue really. If someone believes enough in the >> project, they will take the time to learn. Switching to a new SCMS, IMO, >> is not going to magically attract tons more developers/contributors. >> Same for switching licenses IMO. > > agreed. the issue is visibility - and that is a matter of public relations > (articles, blogs, posts, news items, and... RELEASES). indeed i think i'm a > problem in that i may be lagged in addressing issues or replying or may even > miss them entirely. > Hehehe, that's the price you pay for being popular :P dh |