From: Christopher M. <cpm...@co...> - 2008-05-23 22:31:42
|
Brian 'morlenxus' Miculcy wrote: > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 12:48:04AM -0500, Alberto Castro wrote: >>> >>> Log Message: >>> Better sorted border menu. >>> > <snip> >> This is good, although "More.." is usually reserved as the last entry on >> a list/menu. Moving on, the contents of the window "border" menu have >> shifted quite a lot (pixels) due to this commit, as seen here: >> >> http://cored.org/tmp/border_menu_shift.png >> >> No longer is there padding between the submenu and the main menu (arrows). >> >> As oppose to what they normally look like under the main menu: >> http://cored.org/tmp/main_menu_.png >> >> Regards > > Well i might put the more... entry at the last item of that menu, any > other oppinions? I don't think More would be too good at the bottom of the menu due to the dynamic nature of the menu position. IE: if you have a window at the bottom of the screen and you open the menu with "More" at the bottom, then that would be the first entry that would get selected from a mouse movement..and odds are what the average user is looking for would not be in the More menu anyway. > I noticed that menu shifted pixels problems too - no clue why that > happens. Anyone? > A reordering of the menu should not have caused this...after all, a menu is still a menu as far as edje is concerned. I looked at the new ordering code and didn't see anything in there that would be causing this, but will take another look. Perhaps some other commit broke the menu ? dh |